[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

now its just Cdonalds

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

dont buy crappy products. Some companies are simply too malicious and should be avoided. Convince others to do the same and tell others and it might even have some impact.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Even better way to enslave people than tying basic things like food, water and shelter to money and controlling how to get money. You will have to pay anything you are told or you will die and/or suffer. Try to rebel in any way and its kill or pain switch for you or refusal of service if its too early for that.

Its scary how this doesnt sound as crazy as it should

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

i wonder how much emissions turning coal to butter creates. Maybe we should turn world's coal to butter so planetkillhappy bastards cant burn it.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

entire "left and right" spectrum is quite stupid in my opinion. While it generally points towards what kind of thoughtset someone might have, it doesnt seem very beneficial and has been corrupted quite badly so that term for other side is red flag for the another side and drives people to think you cant have something from both ends.

There should be something else in its place, but i cant come up with anything better on the spot though. Personally i have tried to start thinking it on spectrum of beneficial to humanity as whole vs not beneficial, though with enough mental gymnastics even that could be corrupted to mean awful things

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

anyone who is too different from the rest will be hounded for it.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Majority of people just dont care about being spied upon unless it directly affects them somehow, at which point its too late for that person. But others having data on you wont likely directly affect you at the moment so not enough people get burned by it for general attitude to change. Smart people understand that all this can very easily change and prepare by not allowing all of their information be available for questionable people to use. Others make fun of them for this and call them crazy until one day they suddenly aren't so crazy any more.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

If someone is telling lies they should be called out for it, but in matter-of-fact way to avoid pointless drama, while providing sources for the truth.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

imo, even cosmetic micro-transaction stuff is disgusting. In single player its absolutely intolerable and in multiplayer its at the edge. Not only it makes creating almost non-existent content more profitable, likely at the expense of worthwhile content because any development costs money. Why make the game better when you can create more cosmetics. I'm not saying creating cosmetics is trivial, but making new skin vs creating actually new content are on completely different scales, especially when those new skins are sometimes just recolouring old ones.

Not having access to cosmetic stuff without paying extra also often detracts from the game for me. As example, in game v-rising there are some cosmetics packs for different skins for your castle's furniture. While you can furnish the place decently with stuff you get, you can be much more creative if you have access to the alternative skins.

If they were all part of some larger expansion pack with something more than just skins, I could accept it but if i have to buy every theme pack separately, I'm not going to do that. I would have much less money available if i had to buy every damn dlc to every game I play. I'd say building and decorating your castle is 50% of the game, less if you don't care about how your castle looks at all. Not buying these dlc make the game less enjoyable for me.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

What possible utility could blockchain even have?

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

this is almost like when people traded baubles for valuable things to unknowing natives. corporations make these inane features and expect us to pay for them by giving them all our information. They dont bother to even ask, just assume we are ok with it by having all this crap on by default.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

I wonder if google was like this from the start and just bid its time and kept appearances. Though more likely it was money and success that changed the company. I resent money so much, not for how its used but what it does to people when you have enough of it. Yet you must have money in this world or you will be trodden to the ground, unable to even feed yourself.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

reksas

joined 1 year ago