[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 71 points 7 months ago

If you have a monopoly and need to maximize profits then the question becomes: Why not?! You could extract more money this way, and it's not like your users would go anywhere else at this point.

That is why it's so important to fight and break up monopolies, and to limit what these companies can do. Because they have no reason not to squeeze every penny they can get out of you!

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 61 points 7 months ago

Do Not Track

Such a simple solution for the cookie banner issue. But it prevented websites from tricking users into allowing them to gather their data, so it had to go.

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 54 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The video is probably factually correct, but very disingenuous with its interpretations and conclusions imo.

Of course Mozilla and Firefox have their own share of problems and bad decisions, and they are pretty well known and talked about from what I've seen, but equating it to Google and Chrome is just pure cynicism. Mozilla having to earn money somehow (1% donations!) and Google trying to maximize profits at all costs is not the same thing, even if it might look similar sometimes.

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 62 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't think there is anything to be concerned about.

Sublinks will live alongside Lemmy, just like kbin does today. Some Lemmy instances might switch to it under the hood at some point, but as a user you probably woudn't even notice the change. All the data would be preserved, so your community would still be there unchanged.

It is basically Lemmy written in a different programming language, with more focus on moderation tools afaik. So for users it looks and works just like any other Lemmy instance does, and it's part of the same Threadi-/Fediverse.

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 65 points 9 months ago

This actually IS theft, selling you something and then stealing it back!

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 64 points 11 months ago

It's pretty logical actually: The advocates of openness must be closed to one thing, and that is whatever aims to destroy openness itself.

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 57 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A better voicemail.

I just re-watched the introduction of the first iPhone, and one thing that stood out to me was this "visual voicemail" thing they showed. To this day I still just get an SMS if someone leaves a message, and then have to call my voicemail and listen to recordings one by one. That's still the norm for standard phone contracts here afaik, it's ridiculous!

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 77 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We need to stop calling it digital "ownership"! You don't get to own anything as a customer on these platforms, because rights that can be taken away on a whim are no rights at all.

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No way the Fedora user figured out how to configure partitions in the installer without having to google it at least five times! I've installed Fedora a few times over the years, and that UI still makes no sense to me!

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reviewers should subtract points from the rating of every new Ubisoft game, for the real potential of something like this happening after the review.

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No.

Imo the more you think about it the more you realize that "god" is just a very human way to cope with feeling lonely or powerless, and life having no ultimate direction or purpose. People imagine a friend or guardian who has a plan and will set things right, and some use this shared fantasy to make others do what they want.

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 70 points 1 year ago

The way they phrase the reasoning in their proposal is just disgusting! Like "Users want advertisers to be happy, and advertisers need ...", as if it's all about what users want.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

shrugal

joined 1 year ago