[-] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For choosing a new community, yeah, but the mods and users may not even know that the instance is going down. I've put a post in the lemm.ee communities that I subscribe to that haven't already had the mods or someone else post something about the instance going down.

EDIT: Honestly, it'd kind of be better if there were some sort of protocol-level way for an instance to announce that it was going offline in N days, because this isn't going to be the last time this happens, and I believe what a user on another home instance is going to see if nothing happens---based on what I saw when kbin.social went dark---is the community appearing to just be inactive. It's not very clear that the instance is dead from that, especially since a lot of communities don't see all that much traffic in the first place.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

https://lemm.ee/communities?listingType=Local

This link will specifically restrict it to communities hosted on lemm.ee.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

I don't know of one, but it's not too bad if you're using the Web UI to just copy-paste and click subscribe on each, unless you have a lot more subscriptions than I do.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago
[-] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

Gotcha, though...given that that's a relatively-small community on piefed.social, I'm thinking that many of the people who see that might be people who are already using piefed.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well, the posts and comments do live on on the views of those communities on other instances, as long as someone subscribed to the communities.

Kagi has a "Fediverse Forums" search lens that can search all the instances, so you could maybe search for your username and a snippit of text from that comment if you use that. My guess is that as long as the Threadiverse grows, other people will probably work on searchability too.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago

Oh, cool. That might warrant an announcement somewhere high-profile, as some people might have been holding off piefed due to wanting a mobile client.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

Well, presumably the userbase isn't going to collectively commit hari-kari, so they should still be around on some other instance.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago
[-] tal@lemmy.today 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The Chinese black-bearded tomb bat in question was reportedly unenthusiastic about the planned event.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Well, they were wrong. The thread was censored after all.

I did answer on that thread:

Probably. For Lemmy instances, read the community rules in the sidebar and instance rules on the instance (in the sidebar when viewing the top-level page).

You could also start your own community on some instance that doesn't take issue with it, or even start your own instance if you're willing to set up and run one.

EDIT: Now you kind of made me curious, and I thought that I'd skim some instances running 0.19.11 (an up-to-date version, so are presumably reasonably maintained). Part of the problem is that there are probably a number of things that instances might (and often do) prohibit, and what an admin might consider objectionable probably ranges from party to party. Like, say you said that you wanted to have a good-faith discussion on the impact of transexuality, weren't going to criticize any individuals involved, and were going to be polite. That might pass muster with some places that have comparatively-restrictive rules...but hard to know in advance.

  • Some straight-up have an explicit prohibition on transphobia.

  • Some prohibit harassment.

  • Some prohibit being "unkind" or similar.

  • Some ask a user to be "respectful". What that entails probably differs from person to person in interpretation.

Might ask an admin in advance.

Going through a couple of general-use instances, some that I would guess, from the rules text, probably are going to be on the more-permissive side:

  • lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org says that they specifically take issue with censorship on many instances. They say that they do have some rules, but nothing on their rules page seems to prohibit criticism of transexuality.

  • discuss.online has a "be nice"-type set of guidelines.

  • real.lemmy.fan has no explicit prohibition other than on harassment and asks users to be kind.

That being said, if you think that you're gonna say something that might raise hackles, maybe ask the admin(s) there to clarify whether it's something that they'd take issue with.

Have you had an opportunity to look at the suggestions I had?

13
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by tal@lemmy.today to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I'm kind of curious as to what people these days are doing on a UPS front, to keep systems running through power outages and provide a clean shutdown prior to batteries becoming exhausted.

It used to be common to see UPS systems sold to give desktop computer systems time to shut down cleanly.
The UPS market seems pretty stale to me. There have been changes over the past twenty years or so that I'd guess have caused some of that:

  • A move to filesystems structured so as to not risk corruption at the filesystem level from power loss at an arbitrary time.

  • Many people using laptops. Doesn't change the situation much for servers, but I think that it reduces volume of the market that might want some kind of UPS.

I had expected that, with the drop in cost of lithium batteries and rise in tremendous rise in use of large batteries, that one would see new lithium-ion UPS units with large capacity.

But in practice, that doesn't seem to be the case. UPS units are still around, but basically only provide a small amount of power, enough time to shut down. They aren't normally geared up to keep systems running for hours.

There are lithium battery-based "home power backup" systems that provide loads of storage and automatic switching over to battery power if the mains power drops. However, these have some serious drawbacks that limit their use in a UPS role:

  • Some of these aren't rated to switch over to battery power within a sharply-bounded amount of time, to avoid risk of momentary power interruption. For many devices, a momentary power interruption isn't a huge deal, but for computers, it matters. I understand that on the order of 10 ms is expected for reliable UPS use, to keep computer power supplies happy.

  • One thing that one would like from a UPS is a clean shutdown prior to the battery becoming exhausted. For that to be done, the UPS needs to report its current charge capacity, so that software on the system can predict remaining runtime before exhaustion. Network UPS Tools is a widely-used Linux UPS-interfacing software package that does this shutdown. But looking at its hardware support grid, there isn't support for these power stations, and I suspect that if there were reasonable charge-level reporting support anywhere, there would be.

  • USB has device classes that permits charge-level reporting, and looking at the USB spec, that appears to be true of USB PD. I have wireless headphones, for example, that make use of this. However, as best I can tell from looking through the kernel source, Linux doesn't provide a way to treat these as a power_supply-class device, the way laptops have a BAT0, BAT1, etc, which would let the OS provide a clean shutdown itself when the time-remaining drops to a critical level. And even though power stations typically provide USB charging, I have not been able to find any that actually report their charge level via that USB in such a fashion.

I can think of at least three viable ways to do provide a large amount of backup power and a clean shutdown, based on what I've seen:

  • I'm sure that there are people who have rigged up some kind of ad hoc system off a full-blown grid-tie power system, with separate batteries, inverter, charge controller, etc. In that case, all one needs is a voltmeter linked to the batteries prior to the voltage-regulation stuff, knowing what battery type is involved, and one could give a capacity estimate. Doing this ad hoc is going to have some drawbacks that I'd hope that a vendor-provided battery management system wouldn't, like having to calibrate to one's batteries and not automatically dealing with battery aging.

  • Simply run a UPS and a "big-battery" lithium backup power station. Plug the UPS into the power station and the computer into the UPS. The UPS provides the rapid changeover time and provides the computer with a warning prior to shutdown. This uses systems that should work out-of-box, but doesn't really seem ideal to me in that one's buying extra hardware and doesn't have a unified view of time remaining on the battery -- the computer thinks that everything's normal until the power station is drained and the UPS kicks on.

  • Some people use old laptops as servers. For those, you can already use the OS's built-in power management to deal with laptop batteries. If you have a power station extending the runtime, great, though in that case, you run into the same "you don't have a unified view of the laptop and power station battery charge" situation.

I'm pretty sure that people out there doing self-hosted servers have thought about this, and I'm curious as to what people out there are doing in terms of the options out there. Do you just not worry about it, given the fact that corruption at a filesystem level isn't such a big deal? Do you just use a UPS for a handful of minutes prior to a clean shutdown, and not try to keep your systems running through longer power outages?

I also don't know how resillient home Internet connections are in the presence of power outages, whether typical cable, fiber, and DSL connections remain functional from the telco's standpoint. I know that cell towers typically have some sort of generator setup, as I've read about those in the past, and believe that I've read that they typically can run for at least several days without power even without technicians driving out. I don't know to what degree that is also true of wired communications hardware. I'm curious as to what the experiences of people who have put their server and network hardware on some form of backup power is. If you keep your on-premises hardware powered, have you retained Internet connectivity in power outages that you've experienced?

1
submitted 2 months ago by tal@lemmy.today to c/news@lemmy.world
21
submitted 3 months ago by tal@lemmy.today to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
1
submitted 3 months ago by tal@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world
1
submitted 3 months ago by tal@lemmy.today to c/europe@feddit.org
1
submitted 3 months ago by tal@lemmy.today to c/europe@feddit.org

Europe's four biggest porn platforms, Pornhub, XNXX, StripChat, and XVideos, all recorded major drops in traffic in the latest transparency reports that EU law requires them which, if true, would exempt them from some of the most arduous requirements of the Digital Services Act (DSA).

1
submitted 3 months ago by tal@lemmy.today to c/europe@feddit.org
51
submitted 3 months ago by tal@lemmy.today to c/news@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25722259

FYI: I ended up posting this with some reservation. Pravda's mediabias is mostly factual. The story sounds quite credible. Other media's report are more or less similar, but weren't as complete. check out telegraph

1
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by tal@lemmy.today to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world

Whenever I've played Steel Division 2 in Proton, I've had some audio crackling. This is typically what one sees with buffer underruns. The audio stack running from a Proton game to audio hardware is pretty complicated, so I assumed, incorrectly, that this was on the Linux system side, spent a lot of time poking at my audio hardware and stack trying to figure out what the cause could be.

Turns out that this isn't a Linux-specific problem, but a Steel Division 2 problem; the fix here appears to work for me as well, which is simply overwriting the game's bundled OpenAL DLL with the latest version. Wanted to post it for others who play the game, or people down the line hitting search engines for a solution.

https://old.reddit.com/r/Steel_Division/comments/11u7t2y/audio_problems_with_steel_division_2/

Well I got a solution if you want to try.

first is install Open AL: https://www.openal.org/downloads/

then what you want to do is download Open AL soft: https://openal-soft.org/#download

install the bin.zip

once you downloaded the archive go into bin->Win64, take the soft_oal.dll in there and replace the file named wrap_oal in the game folder. (obviously you have to rename the soft_oal to wrap_oal)

104
56
submitted 5 months ago by tal@lemmy.today to c/news@lemmy.world
59
submitted 6 months ago by tal@lemmy.today to c/news@lemmy.world

This is a newly disclosed plot and marks yet another alleged attempt on Trump’s life by the Iranian regime.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 275 points 1 year ago

No flying machine will ever reach New York from Paris.

googles

Interestingly, when he wrote that, it was part of a larger quote saying virtually the same thing that you are, just over a century ago:

Wilbur in the Cairo, Illinois, Bulletin, March 25, 1909

No airship will ever fly from New York to Paris. That seems to me to be impossible. What limits the flight is the motor. No known motor can run at the requisite speed for four days without stopping, and you can’t be sure of finding the proper winds for soaring. The airship will always be a special messenger, never a load-carrier. But the history of civilization has usually shown that every new invention has brought in its train new needs it can satisfy, and so what the airship will eventually be used for is probably what we can least predict at the present.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

tal

joined 2 years ago