[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

Name one thing they have ever lied about lmao

This week you guys thought they were lying when they reiterated words from Zelensky

You already support shelling of civilians, why not openly support this? What's the difference? Is there only lint between your ears?

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

Real smart buddy you already lost your Sarcasm Allowed Award

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

https://annas-archive.se/md5/cf3d8f9c2a23ba844a0e749908f89a06 try reading one book about the country you pretend to understand 😄

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 month ago

Go away boomer

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

Great thing to say for redditors who have zero original thoughts and cannot contribute to any topic in depth

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

This is another one of the Lemmy.world reply guy's accounts btw

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 month ago

I'm just asking would you respect them more or less if they did whatever they felt was pragmatic, rather than following the rules of Islamic warfare. Would you like me to explain the rules ❀◕ ‿ ◕❀

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Credit to Hasan for openly identifying himself as an eclectic "social libertarian", usually I have to spend way too much explaining to people how almost every grifter fits the bill. (As in he actually used the term to describe his positions in earnest. I'm not just inferring it from the following quote, which I did get the context for and is not a joke.)

[-] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago

That guy again lmao why do "security researchers" keep recommending signal with that softheaded blog. Get real

view more: ‹ prev next ›

tastemyglaive

joined 3 months ago