Irgendwie widerspricht der ganze Teil dem ersten und der letzten Satz.
Die Aussage, dass arabische Menschen in Israel durchaus strukturell diskriminiert werden, aber prinzipiell alle Rechte genießen, widerspricht der Aussage, dass es sich bei Israel nicht um einen Apartheidsstaat handelt? Aha. Interessante Interpretation.
I’m not sure I was disagreeing with you in the previous statement
Then don't repeat things I explicitly mentioned, as if I said something else?
Also get better examples. Brooks break down as easy as Asics, Saucony, whatever. They are exactly the "single use" product I spoke about, making the shoe and clothing industry in general highly non carbon neutral, which was my point.
it isn’t exactly easy to find good shoes unless you invest a lot of money into them
Yes, it's called the Sam Vimes "Boots" theory of socioeconomic unfairness.
You could blame that on car-dependency
I don't blame that on anything but capitalism.
That's why I wrote "the vast majority"??
And hundreds of miles, before you throw away a pair of shoes, my... Look, that might mean much to a Northern American who drives everywhere.
"Hundreds of miles" is what I actually run each year, and then I get lots of hiking and just walking around on top of that. I guess I can measure my Redwings and Hanwag in tens of thousands kilometers each, and my Lundhags I could pass down if I had kids.
As a European who knows imperial units, it's not how it works for us, and it's not the point.
I can tell you approximately what a litre is the same way you can judge a gallon. By experience. By comparison. You know a "gallon of milk", I know "a litre of milk".
I can tell you what a meter is, but that doesn't give me the power to tell your height to the centimeter.
Just today, I had to mop up a water leak. I couldn't have told you how many litres it was until I had it in the bucket, because it was spread out on the floor.
The point of the metric system is not that everything is tidy, that a screen is not 38 cm but 40 cm.
The point is that I can tell you that 10 40cm screens are 4 meters. That a ton of water is 1000 kg, which is a cubic meter, which is 100x100x100 cm.
The problem with imperial units is not the units themselves, it's the confusing calculations you have to take because you have a different unit which is 3, 12, 16, etc times the other unit.
How much is 16 1/3 cubic foot in inches. That is the issue at hand.
That's the same thing, the units are just proportional
Sure, if you put it like that. But I do have the feeling many US people treat imperial units like completely different things and have absolutely no mental concept of a relation between them, especially between length and volume.
I know, its just easier to say a foot than 30 centimeters.
That’s just a completely arbitrary thing. It’s easier to answer „how tall are you“ with „one eighty“ instead of „five foot eleven“ 🤷♀️
It doesn’t seem to be an issue for „metric people“ at all, nobody is missing the foot in Europe.
Because if it were convenient we would have that, the same way we have a ton, or a pound (500 g), which are in common use. You have the decimeter (10 cm), but nobody uses it. There used to be a unit called „Elle“, which is 50 cm, and it’s just the name for the stick, nobody says „give me 3 Ellen of canvas“.
I would use metric because the advantages of imperial are probably not applicable.
I still fail to see those advantages.
If I'm just estimating and it doesn't matter much, I'll probably use imperial
Yes, because you’re used doing so, not because it’s more practical or convenient. Metric people do estimate things as well.
It’s called an example. Want another one? How many laps do you need to run on a 400 m track to run a 10k? How many people can you serve with your 2.5 kg steak if everybody needs to get a 250 g steak? Need more?
Hah! Yeah, I understand, but I’ve been hearing this in spoken English as well, „half seven“ instead of „half past six“, though in school I was taught only the latter existed.
It’s like this in German as well, and it’s also regionally different, but once you get it it’s actually nice:
In most parts of Germany (and where I grew up) and in Standard German you tell time (literally) as:
Six, quarter past six, half seven, quarter before seven, seven.
In the south of Germany it’s: six, quarter past six, half seven, three quarter seven, seven. This never made sense to me, until…
… I moved to East Germany, where it’s: six, quarter seven (!), half seven, three quarter seven, seven.
Imagine my face, I never even had heard of this before I moved there 😂
I immediately picked this up because it rolls off your tongue way easier in German than the standard way. And it’s mindblowingly logical. I love it:
You just need to imagine an hour as a cake: one quarter of seven, half of seven, three quarters of seven, seven. Genius.
Yeah, but I’m used to that, it’s the same in German (and it sucks, especially for people with dyslexia), no, what I meant is the way they actually count.
You know, like 99 in French is „quatre-vingt-dix-neuf“? „4 (times) 20 (plus) 10 (plus) 9“.
Which I always thought the most idiotic way ever to come up with counting? Until I learned about the Danish…
Ever wondered why 50 in Danish is „halvtreds“? Because „halv tredje“ means… „half-third“? Which is 2 1/2.
Are you sitting? „Halvtreds“ is short for „halvtredsindstyve“, which literally means „half third times twenty“.
2 1/2 * 20 = 50 🤡
Same with 70, 90…
Shrike. Ts. Cute. Wanna know what’s it called in German?
NEUNTÖTER
(killer of nine)
Yo do understand there’s countries outside the US, right? 🤡