47
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Skywatch Blue / Anti-Alf Aktion (@skywatch.blue) — Bluesky

---

Edit

Somebody can subscribe to blocklists without ever actually talking to the accounts. In other words - if I have a hammer and sickle Unicode character in my bio and those turds have put me in their list - I'm blocked by all the subscribers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nasezero@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, Bluesky blocklists are ripe for abuse. Anyone can make them and promote them for whatever reason, and hundreds/thousands of users blindly subscribe to several when they first sign up.

Consider this a PSA for anyone using Bluesky: avoid using blocklists unless you know and trust whoever is running the list. I know at least one of the big "anti-right winger" blocklists floating around is run by a real piece of shit named brainnotonyet.bsky.social who uses his list specifically to abuse women on the platform - him and his friends stalk and harass leftist women on the platform (while feigning being leftists/radlibs themselves), and then when any of the women speak up, they get added to a blocklist alongside a bunch of 4chan nazis, and then everyone subscribed to the list just stop seeing the victim's posts, even if they follow them.

[-] machinya@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

will stop seeing posts even if they follow them

wow, is this real? like, what type of social media is it that you can block your own follows without even telling you explicitly. I get the idea of wanting to get automatic block of specific stuff (even if I don't agree) but having blocklists take precedence over something you actively opted in for makes no sense at all

[-] nasezero@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's actually a fantastic system if you want to build a social media site where you can serially abuse women and then completely erase them from the timelines of anyone who follows your banlists whenever they speak up about the abuse. Which, given the usual crowd that builds these platforms, that was almost certainly the intent from the beginning. Hell, that's literally what zuck originally made Facebook for doomer

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
47 points (98.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13610 readers
737 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS