496
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 113 points 1 week ago

Rainbow capitalism is exactly why corporations aren't allowed at pride.

They say they love their gay ~~wage slaves~~ employees, they support their trans ~~abuse victims~~ "family members", and then in the same breath donation to Republicans who want them gone. Fund politicians at home and abroad who want them removed by any means, "corrected" by camps.

Every company that has a rainbow logo in June somehow never has one on twitter for the regions that openly hate and harm LGBT people. Every company that pays lip service for the gays to fork over their cash will gladly kiss Trump's ass as he shoves us into the camps.

No corporation loves gays, even if the CEO and every board member is queer. They will gladly sell themselves if it meant 0.1% gains in stock prices.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 33 points 1 week ago

There's a reason it's coming from the marketing departments. They're using it to market to people. To sell products. It was never anything more than bastardizing pride to sell cheap crap.

[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

This somehow manages to cause us to backslide. Pride messaging ends up selling well. People who aren't into it, but aren't really bigots are like "eh cool, equality sounds great". Obviously the communities that it targets, it's working on. The people who don't like it - aren't gonna cause a big fuss about it, so the buy their shit and get out.

But then the problem becomes those same people who said nothing in the store - and those who aren't actively "into" it, are now seeing it everywhere. And they aren't tying it in their minds to an equality movement, they're tying it to advertising. But you know how the advertising gets - it's kind of "fad"-y. Well, the rainbow advertising 'fad' as been going on for quite some time.

So now, LGBT stuff is "everywhere", but - people are growing tired of it for the wrong reasons. They're growing tired of the advertising side of it, and it's causing problems on the human-rights side of it...

[-] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The only company to ever be brave about queer representation was and continues to be Subaru

[-] peregrin5@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Well we are their main demographic so it's still a good financial decision for them.

[-] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My understanding is their ads in the 90’s are why that’s the case!

[-] felsiq@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Can you elaborate on this? I’m guessing it’s related to the “lesbians drive Subarus” stereotype but I’ve always been curious why that stereotype ever existed

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago

Subaru used to advertise to queer folk in the 90s before it was cool.

I wouldn't bet on them staying that way after 20 or 30 years, but hey, it's something

[-] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

“Lesbaru” depicted a same-sex (f) couple in an ad in the 90’s IIRC like it was just a normal thing. Which it is!

[-] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Reminder that Ellen hung out with George w bush

https://kennorphan.com/2017/10/26/canonizing-criminals-and-the-lobotomization-of-public-memory/ellen-degeneres-embraces-george-w-bush-photo-from-the-ellen-show/

When called out for going to a sports game with someone who endorsed a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, opposed adoption rights, anti hate crime laws, and anti discrimination laws, she doubled down and did a little segment on her show about how he’s alright and posted a selfie

While it is true that bush softened on gay rights issues later that was almost exclusively after he had left the presidency and thus was basically irrelevant. When the man had extreme power his policy was disgusting. When he listened to gay republican groups he did not soften at all. It was merely when his image needed to be rebranded after he was known mostly as a war criminal responsible for murdering 1 million Iraqis that he decided to soften his stance a bit. By then the Republican Party had gotten so fucking loony plenty of people accepted him as downright rational and kind. Instead of what he was, which is basically trump with a bit of impulse control and decorum

The takeaway is exactly what you said. The unifying factor here is social class. Ultra rich gays will happily throw you under the bus for 1 more dollar. Tim Cook will happily support someone who will stop him from adopting children or getting married if it means apples market share grows by 3%. He does not care because if it truly matters to him he will just find a way to circumvent the law with his enormous wealth. He does not worry about spousal decision making because he will hire a private live in physician. He will hire a surrogate to act as a legal agent for adoption in name only. If it comes to camps he obviously won’t go to the camps. If it gets to the point where he would be anywhere near at risk he would expatriate at a moments notice on a private jet. Etc. but you won’t have those luxuries. Fuck you, got mine.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
496 points (98.2% liked)

memes

11521 readers
1079 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS