167

Libs: nuclear horror won't be so bad (i.imgur.com)

submitted 2 years ago by DoobKIller@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago

I've studied nuclear weapons. I'm no physicist but I've read pretty extensively on the after-effects.

These people are fucking stupid

Do they address why they have smaller yields? Because targeting systems are much more advanced. That's it. That's the reason. It's like arguing it's better to be shot in the heart with a single round rather than blasted with buckshot in the center of the chest. You're still fucking dead.

[-] determinism2@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago

I have a PhD in nuclear physics from a top 10 science guy university in the world, and I don't believe nuclear armageddon is a problem. And I'm also not interested in discussing it (just so that no one comes with bs talking points, I've seen enough). I'm just saying this so that you don't stumble on your own delusional bubble too much.

You don't believe in science. You believe in TV. You haven't read a single peer reviewed paper on the matter, let alone papers that have a different point of view. So spare me your condescending bullshit.

Now go ahead and downvote me so that you can sleep better at night after having excluded me, the infidel. Just remember that many people out there have degrees, educated and read 100 times on the matter than you and disagree with your delusions on the matter. Enjoy four faith in TV.