What if instead of Ronald Reagan it was Ronald Gaygun and he shot ppl with a gay gun that makes you gay? (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 days ago by Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

yes, at first and for a long time while the perceived need for machismo gradually fades away.

I don't think it necessarily would fade away in those circumstances. You can have gay patriarchy. It'd be different than hetero patriarchy, but patriarchy is patriarchy.

[-] woodenghost@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

Yes, I guess the economic reasons for patriarchy would still be there. Splitting productive wage labor from unpaid labor that reproduces the ability to work would still be helpful to capital.