219

Link

I think it’s a good statement, short and to the point. The replies are absolute poison though, hasbara bots really honing in on them. Feds will try and make something stick but it doesn’t sound like he was even a member.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Honestly with the responses I almost wonder if “He was not a member but we support his actions” would’ve been a better statement

Like, obviously I understand why they didn’t do that, but everyone’s acting like they did anyway, so why bother downplaying? At some point just say “Killing Zionists is good, end of sentence”

Edit: Sorry to be very clear I’m not saying they should have done this. This is just a comment about how even when they say the polite and proper thing people call them terrorists anyway

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 90 points 1 day ago

eh, no need to self-torch an org, especially over reply guys

[-] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 27 points 1 day ago

They could have omitted the do not support part entirely from the statement

[-] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago

They didn't say why they didn't support it. If it was "we do not condemn ANY violence EVER" I'd agree with you. But the PSL does not support adventurism and they didn't explicitly condemn it either.

PSL has nothing to gain by associating with this act, so why risk it at the moment?

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Meh, whatever. For based akzione there is unity of fields (which was nearly shattered over minor actions), and americans are largely passive, so it's not like even direct call to redacted-1redacted-2 from psl would increase anything material, they are not bla with infrastructure to do that sort of stuff (and bla was not that effective due to chosen methods being extremely obvious, but same is true here so besides the point)

[-] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago
[-] plinky@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

black liberation army , of assata shakur fame wiki link

[-] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago

Ehh, their lawyers probably said to put it in for good luck.

[-] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 81 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is probably the right move. "Do not support" falls short of "condemn," and now is absolutely not the time for them getting caught in the weeds explaining the nuances of how adventurism contradicts democratic centralism and posing hypotheticals like "this would be good if we decided to start doing assassinations in a committee."

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 68 points 1 day ago

PSL leadership is probably afraid they’re going to be terminated the way Ferguson organizers were

[-] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 34 points 1 day ago

Yeah like I said, I know why and I do think it’s the right decision but fuck seeing the responses makes me go “Why bother”

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

saying something like that would prevent many people from openly supporting the PSL out of fear of retribution, both from the past and in the future

[-] JD_Vyvanse@hexbear.net 48 points 1 day ago

that would be a massive security liability, the state is already black bagging people just for op-eds.

Absolutely not. The risk of that outweighs the benefit.

[-] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago

the benefit.

Which, tbh, is none. Anyone saying they'd join this organization if they defended this guy or something is lying and if not is probably very immature anyways.

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 32 points 1 day ago

And let’s be honest, with enough traction, they qill be branded a terrorist org by the us administration either way

this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
219 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13836 readers
1060 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS