this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
-40 points (23.7% liked)
You Should Know
38911 readers
9 users here now
YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.
All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.
Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:
**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content.
**
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated.
If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.
Partnered Communities:
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
Community Moderation
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
Credits
Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My issue is your words not matching the committee's words. Your words are the problem, and your words are what you need to defend. This careful pivot to "but the committee!!!" isn't fooling anyone op. Defend your words. Where did the committee discuss radiological? Did I miss it somewhere perhaps?
my words are accurate and sourced.
your confusion, feigned or otherwise, is your own problem.
you missed many things. or are pretending to anyway, in an effort to find a leg to stand on.
you aren't going to be able to fabricate any valid rejection against the abundance of verified historical evidence, but imagine away.
I don't have to imagine jack shit. When I challenge you to say where you got even one single line about "radiological" and you just say "it is accurate and sourced" instead of saying where exactly we can find it, you do my work for me.
It's not hard to go "Senate subcommittee report, page xyz, go look." Would be a lot better than "trust me bro, accurate and sourced, it's somewhere in there I promise."
These niche tech communities like Lemmy are not exactly full of stupid people, we know how arguments and citations work. You've still got a chance here to prove me wrong, you know. Just need to put the work in, assuming you're not some random, lazy troll. Just gotta copy/paste one single piece that confirms radiological something and say where you got it, that simple.
"I don't have to imagine..."
you don't have to, and yet you insist that your fabrications make a lick of difference in face of the abundant documented evidence of chemtrails and weapons testing.
your imagination has no bearing on the evidence.
i see now, you've conflated outside unethical radiological tests with the Church committee evidence here about biological and chemical testing. no worries.
as far as I remember, the Church committee doesn't call Vanderbilt to the hearing.
No, I'm referring to when you said
in the original main body of your post. By the way, we can all see the edit marker from you editing it 22 minutes ago. My first reply to you remains unedited, though, it's exactly how I originally wrote it, where I directly quoted you three times.
Trying to pull a ghost edit on us betrays you as malicious, though. You're not just wrong, you're actively trying to do harm. Otherwise you could just admit you made a mistake like a normal person can.
Regardless, now that your credibility is shattered by your own actions, my work here is done. Toodles~! It's been fun, I do miss rhetorically fencing with trolls sometimes.
no worries. I understand why you're pretending to be confused.
I have removed the word "radiological" for you.
you made zero progress on disproving chemtrails, the biological weapon experiments and the 1976 Senate hearing, but that is all objective historical fact verified by the US government.
you never had a chance.
Hey now, I wasn't trying to disprove chemtrails, or anything else you listed, that's not how proof works. Nothing can be proven to be impossible or not exist, that's illogical. I was pointing out you mixing together facts with lies to manipulate.
Now you say you removed radiological, but it's too late. I had to call you out, first, and the timestamps show it. Because you tried being sneaky first. Just like a sneaky liar. I would far rather be honestly confused than a dishonest manipulator.
"wasn't trying to disprove chemtrail"
you tried, you failed, it was fun.
keep making things up, I said the same at the top as I am saying now.
chemtrails are real, the US government admitted it at the 1976 Church committee hearing
the facts are facts despite your bitter imagination.
If you were consistent in what you said, there wouldn't be edit markers.
you can check my post history, I constantly edit things to make sure people understand as clearly as possible what I'm saying, specifically for cases like yours. I'll edit them days after the post if I think there's a more concise and clear way that a future reader or you couldn't possibly misinterpret, no matter how little you read and how much you're making up.
you're welcome.
People know what ghost edits are. You didn't clarify shit, you deleted a lie you got caught on. We are not stupid.
edit: Oh, and admitting you do them often is actually worse.
you making things up does not invalidate any part of this post, that has been the same from top to bottom.
the US government, military and intelligence agencies admitted to dispersing chemical and biological weapons by land, sea and air(chemtrails) hundreds of times on US citizens without consent or notification over 30 years.
this is corroborated by ample amounts of evidence, including documentation and the testimony of the experimenters.
all you're accomplishing by forcing me to correct you is spreading the truth about the 1976 Church committee and the inhumane biological weapons experiments conducted on non-consenting US citizens.
i love getting the truth out there, and it's not exactly painful to watch you repeatedly trip over your imagination and fall on your face, so please keep making things up that I get to correct.
Nice wall of text instead of dealing with what I said, you deleted one of your lies. Desperate are we?
Don't do ghost edits. Editing every comment does not hide them either, people can tell when things happened from everyone else's timestamps, which you can't change. You are not the first person to think of this.
you're afraid of concise, undeniable facts. not a shocker.
doesn't change the facts or the consistent point of this post: that there were real chemtrails, there were biological and chemical weapons experiments that the US government, military and intelligence agencies admitted to conducting on US citizens without consen, during their testimony in the church committee hearings.
swing away.
My whole point is you mix truth and lies. You pointing out the true parts over and over now, is consistent with this. So is you doing ninja edits to hide when the lie parts are caught. It's all in the quotes and timestamps.
Do you have any evidence of me lying anywhere?
your whole point is to discredit at the facts of the post,, but this post has been consistent top to bottom, and entirely reliably source, so you're not going to make it any farther than the starting line you're still hunkered behind.
You should review my old comments, that is not an accurate description of what I've said. Perhaps you have me confused with someone else. From my earliest and still completely unedited comments, I have said you say some true things, and some lies, and that you mix them together.
I have never tried to "discredit all" of anything. I have fully acknowledged that some things you say are true. You just lie alongside the true things, and then delete them when you are caught.