35

U.S. President Donald Trump, in an interview with NBC News on Saturday, said there would be "serious consequences" if billionaire Elon Musk funds Democratic Party candidates to run against Republicans who vote for Trump's sweeping tax-cut bill.

Trump declined to say what those consequences would be in the phone interview, and went on to add that he had not had discussions about whether to investigate Musk.

Asked if he thought his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO was over, Trump said, "I would assume so, yeah."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

If any Democrat accepts funds from Musk they've lost my vote.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

If they take his money and then release a public statement calling him a nazi piece of shit who will never have any influence in their office I'd allow it. Bonus points if they promise Musk they won't do that before doing it.

Otherwise, yeah. Musk needs to be a Kanye level pariah at least for what he's done.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

I'm mixed on this. I understand the sentiment, but it probably depends on who they're running against. If it's a red state and they're running against a republican, I would be fine with them taking the money.

[-] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Musk is a nazi, as evidenced by his nazi salute earlier this year.

Any democrat that accepts nazi money, it's saying they're fine with nazis, which makes them a nazi, because the only scum that's fine with nazis, are other nazis.

You can't condemn nazi behavior while taking money from nazis, and allowing them to support you. You tell them to fuck all the way off, because the only thing a nazi deserves is the comfort of a grave.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

as evidenced by his nazi salute earlier this year.

I would say the more compelling evidence is the fact that his entire family wealth is a direct result of Apartheid, and now that it has earned him literal richest man in the world status, he uses that status to go out in public and, without a hint of irony, say that white people in South Africa are victims of racism.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

I see what you're saying, but taking nazi money from a nazi to spend and then using it to do good in the world? It's like an ethics trolley problem.

[-] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Taking nazi money by seizing his assets is how you go about using nazi money, not by accepting the support of a nazi. If you're accepting the support of a nazi, you're no better than conservatives currently accepting the support of nazis.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

I feel like that's the best option and you're right. I just don't see that happening in America now or in the near future. The next best option is to do what the other poster said and say they will not be bought and won't be doing anything he asks before they take the money. Also, again, they're not going against another democrat.

[-] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

By accepting money from a nazi, they're saying they can be bought by a nazi. It's lobbying, and it's why we file taxes for a return every year, why climate change is ignored, internet isn't a utility, weed is federally illegal, and the fairness doctrine got chucked out the window.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

That will win you a moral high ground and lose you an election thereby extending a fascist rule. Money wins elections. You can't "sieze assets" when you aren't in office. It's delusional to think someone will be able to turn down money from the biggest donors and get into any position that will change something meaningful at this point. They need to make sure the money doesn't have any strings attached to it, and get into office. Then make changes.

[-] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wouldn’t say I’d be “fine” with them taking the money under any circumstance. But it’s never going to lead me to voting for repugnacans either directly or indirectly through abstaining.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

That's what I'm afraid of, that this would lead people to vote 3rd party or republican. Republicans being split up would be great too.

[-] blitzen@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

I’d go so far as to say Musk donating to a democrat candidate may be done explicitly as a poison pill to reduce support from the base.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

You can refuse donations. Or publicly disavow his support if it's in the form of independently bought media.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

Ah, so you're fine with Republicans winning.

[-] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

And you're fine with nazis getting involved with the party? That's some dumb fuck conservative double think.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

You really strongly believe in Citizens United, I guess? A dollar means nothing. It's something you exchange for goods and services. If Musk gives a dollar to a Democratic candidate, he's simply empowering that candidate. It's not some kind of evil spell that instantly contaminates the candidate.

Sheesh, no wonder American politics is such an irredeemable mess of authoritarianism.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You said it yourself. Money is exchanged for goods and services. What is Musk buying? His history doesn't lean towards good will.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

He's buying a Democrat into power.

If Musk donated money to an animal shelter would you conclude that puppies must be evil? Look at what's being done, not who it's being done by.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Brother there's no amount of lesser of two evils that lets you pick a Nazi. That's a fucking Line in the Sand.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

I'm not saying vote for Musk. I'm saying vote for a Democrat.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If they're on musk's payroll that's who you're really voting for. Not even mentioning the fact that if you're taking Nazi money well..

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago

So it's trivial for Musk to decide who you vote for, then. You don't care about the candidate's position, just whose "team" he's on.

It's kind of pathetic watching Americans continue sabotaging their chances of getting out of authoritarian control even now. What will it take to end that purity spiral?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you think voting for a guys who work for Nazis is how you get out of authoritarian control I don't know what to tell you. Also musk isn't the one deciding that there. The candidates are. If they show me that they're Nazi sympathizers I'm not going to vote for them. If you find that to be a weird Line in the Sand for somebody then I find that really weird about you.

I'll say it again my Line in the Sand is nazis. If you think that's a purity test fine I'm comfortable with that. That's one that I'm proud to have.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

I'll say it again my Line in the Sand is nazis.

Right. Mine too. And supporting the Republican candidate in the upcoming elections means you're supporting the nazi candidate.

The US is a two party system. If you don't vote for one, you're tacitly supporting the other. That's how Trump got into power. I have no sympathy for people who continue to perpetuate his power.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's clearly not your line since you are sitting here saying you should vote for nazis.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

You think Democrats are nazis?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If they're taking money and orders from Elon Musk yes. That's what I'm saying. I said it a number of times even.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

The "and orders" part is something you're assuming.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Buddy if you're going to sit here and pretend that that's not how political donations work I don't have any time for you.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

And you're worth talking to? You're fine with handing a vote to a Republican based on nothing other than where the funding for the Democrat's campaign came from.

As I pointed out above, the US is a two-party system. You pick one or you pick the other. You're picking the Republicans. Good luck with that.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You’re fine with handing a vote to a Republican

You're advocating for voting for people whose loyalties lie with nazis.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is and will never be any clean way to take money from Nazis. We call those people who do Nazis. If you don't have any morals about saying no to Nazis that's your choice some of us do. There's no political election where you should choose between two Nazis. Never. There is no political calculation that makes it okay ever. Cuz again they are Nazis. That's what you're endorsing. You're saying choose the lesser of two Nazis (hint no such thing). There's the line of the sand enjoy being on the wrong side.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

And so Musk can instantly and trivially get you to drop your support for any Democrat he wants to. He decides who you vote for.

You're saying choose the lesser of two Nazis.

When you have only two choices, then yes choose the lesser Nazi. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here. You think it's appropriate to chose the greater Nazi?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

We already talked about this before but I guess you missed it so I'll say it again. They choose to take the money. If they're not Nazis they would say no I'm not taking Elon Musk money he's a Nazi. If they take it then they're Nazis so no he's not making the choice they are. I'm believing them when they tell me they're a Nazi.

Also since you cut it out of your quote there I'll say again, there's no such thing as the Lesser Nazi. There's just Nazis. You're arguing for voting for Nazis. Literally you've done it multiple times now. I won't do that. I don't care that you think there are good Nazis out there I don't fucking believe that. The only good Nazi is a Dead Nazi.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

They can choose to take the money and not do whatever it is Musk is telling them to do.

This is the absolute black-and-white with-us-or-against-us purity spiral that I've been criticizing this whole thread. If you're going to refuse to support a Democrat the moment he strays slightly from your perfect ideal, even by association rather than by any actual action, then you're useless when it comes to helping America's political disaster. You just keep screaming "Nazi, nazi, nazi!" And provide no actual benefit.

This discussion well and truly Godwinned.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

At least you're honest about wanting two nazi parties.

[-] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It’s a fine line to walk. We do not want to support anyone who freely gets in bed with Musk, but draw too hard a line and we end up with worse (see supporters of Palestine and Biden/Harris/Trump.)

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, so you're fine with nazis.

There is no line with centrists.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
35 points (97.3% liked)

News

30287 readers
1863 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS