This simply isn't accurate. China has surplanted the US as the leading trading partner of almost every country on earth, creating far more room for the global south to maneuver and pressure their own development. All across Asia, Africa, and Latin America, the US's power has been in decline. We're in a second pink tide in Latin America, including the best political leadership Mexico has had in a century, the solidification of the PSUV in Venezuela, and the loss of America's staunchest anti-communists ally to pro-China, any-Israel Gustavo Petro. France has lost almost all of its military presence in Africa, including but not limited tothe obvious anti-imperialist crown jewel the AES. Vietnam is closer to China than it's been since the early days of the revolution and following the same path of economic development. Russia is winning (slowly) in Ukraine while the imperial European polity slithers away to global irrelevance, as is the fate of all US allies.

And despite what some on here will tell you, by every single metric, dollar hegemony is in decline. China has rapidly built a replacement for the SWIFT system and is shifting more and more of its trade away from the dollar. No, it did not deal a dramatic death blow to the dollar - because the US, as we can see, is not an irrelevant power unable to deal death and destruction. Instead, China is overseeing and directing the managed decline of the American financial empire while building socialism at home for 15% of the world's population.

Not that China is beyond reproach. There is no excuse for their continued trade with Israel, though that too is declining precipitously. But generally, we should recognize that China is, in fact, the heart of global anti-imperialism. Without a doubt, the number one reason for the dramatic decline in US power is the steady leadership of the Communist Party of China and their studious, strategic implementation of the immortal science of Marxism-Leninism.

China has invested hundreds of billions into the global south and has demonstrably raised wages of probably billions of people in the process. I remember a paper from a few years ago that demonstrated it with China telecom expansion. China providing affordable phone and Internet access for people who otherwise didn't have it increased real wages for impoverished people.

I was just watching the China Report on breakthrough news and they cited an increase of Indonesia's state income from 3 billion to 32 billion in two years after China invested 30 billion in nickel processing facilities there.

These are just two examples of what I assume to be hundreds where China is taking the money they make and investing it around the world in a way that is mutually beneficial and improves the lives of people in ways that most people probably aren't aware of. Of course the relationship isn't totally equal, China is coming out with the better end of the deal in most cases, but we also have many examples of responsible state leadership from partner countries negotiating for better deals and getting them. Gyude Moore and Varoufakis have spoken about this at length.

So it isn't accurate to say China is winning while everyone else loses. China is certainly doing a lot of good around the world which has real impacts on average people; infrastructure, employment, healthcare, and more. They are sharing their wealth in a way that is building up the productive forces of the world