151
submitted 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by vegeta1@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 24 points 9 hours ago

Liberals have been defending this saying Colbert talked this over with Zohran before hand and was just giving him questions that would be asked by the media anyway as well as giving him a platform to answer these accusations.

[-] stink@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 8 hours ago

I saw that too, Sam Seder was talking about that being a possibility. And to be honest I can kinda see it, only old people watch Colbert, Mamdani going on his show and clearing up the lies about his antisemitism (and proving he's a zionist 🤢) was "good" PR to get some votes in

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 21 points 7 hours ago

proving he's a zionist 🤢

Maybe it’s cope but my feeling is that he calculated his answers to answer very loaded questions without supporting Zionism as such.

When Colbert asks if Israel has a right to exist, Mamdani says all countries do. When asked about antisemitism, Mamdani says hate in general is bad and he plans to increase funding against hate crimes - by which he could mean protecting vulnerable minorities in general, rather than dogwhistling Zionism which wouldn’t make sense given other things he has said.

I stopped watching after about 15 minutes though, so maybe he said something else that I missed.

[-] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I could see it, too. I doubt these interviews are that authentic. I was Laos against Stephen for the way he did the interview, but I've changed my mind and am with Sam Seder's theory now.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
151 points (99.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

13903 readers
1051 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS