102
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Posadas@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

How tf you transport a woman for prostitution but that's somehow not considered sex trafficking

[-] frogbellyratbone_@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

CW: sex assault

transport for prostitution generally means you're a pimp but you're nice about it

sex trafficking generally means you're a pimp and you're violent

[-] Lyudmila@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

(level of niceness/violence to buyers, not to the women being trafficked.)

[-] frogbellyratbone_@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

is that true? idk NY law but CA law trafficking has a component of forcing someone to do prostitution against their will

[-] Lyudmila@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

In this (and most cases) there's an ocean between the law as written and how it actually gets applied. This was a pretty cut and dry example of trafficking, even including situations where victims definitionally could not give consent and yet here we are.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If, despite all the efforts of the DNC and the GOP, a good law (like a bill meant to protect vulnerable individuals) somehow manages to make it onto the books, it immediately gets effectively repealed through interpretation by the judiciary until it becomes a waste of ink on the code books.

Add that the average jury is composed almost entirely of reactionary treatlerites who are easily swayed by the theatrics of highly-paid lawyers and this is what you get.

This is how you get billionaire celebrities getting a verbal warning for their 27th DUI.

load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
102 points (99.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13919 readers
962 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS