Frantz Fanon, born on this day in 1925, was a West Indian Pan-Africanist philosopher and Algerian revolutionary most known for his text The Wretched of the Earth.
Fanon was born to an affluent family on the Caribbean island of Martinique, then a French colony which is still under French control today. As a teenager, he was taught by communist anti-colonial thinker Aimé Césaire (1913 - 2008).
Fanon was exposed to much European racism during World War II. After France fell to the Nazis in 1940, a Nazi government was set up in Martinique by French collaborators, whom he describedas taking off their masks and behaving like "authentic racists".
Fighting for the Allied forces, Fanon also observed European women liberated by black soldiers preferring to dance with fascist Italian prisoners rather than fraternize with their liberators.
While completing a residency in psychiatry in France completing, Fanon wrote and published his first book, "Black Skin, White Masks" (1952), an analysis of the negative psychological effects of colonial subjugation upon black people.
Following the outbreak of the Algerian revolution in November 1954, Fanon joined the Front de Libération Nationale, a nationalist Algerian party. Working at a French hospital in Algeria, Fanon became responsible for treating the psychological distress of the French troops who carried out torture to suppress anti-colonial resistance, as well as their Algerian victims.
While organizing for Algerian independence in Ghana, Fanon was diagnosed with leukemia that would ultimately kill him. He spent the last year of his life writing his most famous work, "The Wretched of the Earth" (French: Les Damnés de la Terre). The text provides a psychiatric analysis of the dehumanizing effects of colonization and examines the possibilities of anti-colonial liberation
Following a trip to the Soviet Union to treat his leukemia, Fanon came to the U.S. in 1961 for further treatment in a visit arranged by the CIA. Fanon died in Bethesda, Maryland on December 6th, 1961 under the name of "Ibrahim Fanon", a Libyan nom de guerre he had assumed in order to enter a hospital after being wounded during a mission for the Algerian National Liberation Front.
"In the World through which I travel, I am endlessly creating myself."
Biography :fanon:
- 🐻Link to all Hexbear comms https://hexbear.net/post/1403966
- 📀 Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube](https://live.hexbear.net/c/movies
- 🔥 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread https://hexbear.net/post/5554224
- ⚔ Come talk in the New Weekly PoC thread https://hexbear.net/post/5485455
- ✨ Talk with fellow Trans comrades in the New Weekly Trans thread https://hexbear.net/post/5550316
- 👊 New Weekly Improvement thread https://hexbear.net/post/5548340
- 🧡 Disabled comm megathread https://hexbear.net/post/5552737
- ☕ Parenting Chat https://hexbear.net/post/5546588
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:

Okay but the red in the vampire's eyes being a reference to a childrens animated movie or the gumbo being authentic doesn't really affect the things upon which me and my interlocutor are commenting.
I will grant you for the sake of argument, without having any knowledge of the subject, that the movie is incredibly well researched, and that every piece of set dressing, every single line and every costume is very authentic even the stuff brought in a clearance sale from a marvel movie. I will also grant you, authentically and not just for the sake of argument here, that there is a lot of value in portraying an underserved community (As indeed the post emancipation pre civil rights black south communities are) authentically in a piece of art, and just allowing it to authentically exist in that milieu. (Especially since this work isn't about the civil rights struggle as a historical event in the sense of being a historical dramatisation and does not center or lionise yankees)
SPOILERS AHEAD. Well, a spoiler but you already said the vampire thing and that's the spoiler. However my comment is that the movie outright states its thesis about the timelessness of art and shows a villain interested in harnessing this power, but it also shows the process of vampirism separating people from their time and becoming timeless in themselves (Losing period accents or adopting more modern stylings etc) and has the villain engaging in equally impressive displays of artistic skill showing works which are by their nature as classics timeless. You can disagree with this analysis, you can even call it shallow or bad if you want, but I don't think any of what you said so far has invalidated or even contested it. And it is a movie that is fine with being fun, it wouldn't have a scene where the heroes almost come to blows twice over the taste of garlic otherwise.