92
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Please show grace for any mistakes, writing this in suboptimal conditions and frankly don't feel like proofreading until I have a PC to access.

Same, lol

I just don't see a need to get this wound up over some dude running for office that had some great platform planks. Can't we just be optimistic for once? And if we can't, how about offering ways to mitigate the potential damage from this guy being a disappointment?

I want more revolutionary optimism around here, less nerding out over books, and more plain language instead of trying to talk like we're in a Parliament in 1870

[-] MizuTama@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

I mean, I agree and sometimes the lines between genuine analysis and doomerism are blurred but most of the doomerism isn't even based in theory at all and just vaguely references it from like 3rd-hand accounts from what I've seen. It's just another way we lib-it up in here

big-cool

[-] MizuTama@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

I mean, I agree and sometimes the lines between genuine analysis and doomerism are blurred but most of the doomerism isn't even based in theory at all and just vaguely references it from like 3rd-hand accounts from what I've seen. It's just another way we lib-it up in here

big-cool

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
92 points (93.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13955 readers
583 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS