122

submitted 1 week ago by corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

91 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago

Gawker appealed the take down order and won.

you must know more details about it than I do, but the end of the story remains that they were forced to pay a fine that shuttered the company so it kinda sounds like you're doing a 'Hillary got more votes' here

oh so we have to play nice with literal demons in order to exist?

No, just don't be an idiot. When you attack someone expect a response.

I'm being condescending and I apologize I just really really do not like this argument you're making

pigpoop

Then don't purposefully misread it in the most uncharitable way possible

[-] frogbellyratbone_@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

so it kinda sounds like you're doing a 'Hillary got more votes' here

pigpoop

no it doesn't. you're only now saying that because you don't know the history re: Gawker's take down but decided to comment on it

No, just don't be an idiot. When you attack someone expect a response.

it's idiotic to attack billionaires... so we have to play nice with them in order to survive?

you just really argued that fucking annoying point twice? and here i thought i was being irrationally condescending.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago

I'm left with the inescapable conclusion that you're either acting in good faith and you're very fucking stupid, or you're acting in bad faith and you're very fucking dishonest.

My statement had an if-then. Your characterization of my statement erases this.

You're deliberately erasing my intent EVEN AFTER HAVING ME FUCKING REPEAT MYSELF SO AS TO CLARIFY and inserting something I didn't say completely of your own creation.

GO. FUCK. YOURSELF.