203
submitted 4 days ago by pylapp@programming.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

About the Online Safety Act in the UK and the Digital Services Act in Europe

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 43 points 4 days ago

i'm looking forward to the more decentralized internet that's brewing up here.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 4 days ago

If these types of laws keep coming there might be a lot of legal liability for running instances of things

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

yeah i think that's what they ultimately want. control all the "information" we get.

we should be organizing more thoroughly to combat this sort of thing that will undoubtedly be more and more common.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Fascists get mad when people are educated.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

Any ideas for that? My main thought is to further develop technology for the anonymous web and get people using it, although probably some form of overtly political activism is also needed

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

some form of overtly political activism is also needed

yup that's the idea, the usual proven methods for pressuring the state will work. extending this to the internet in the form of stuff like boycotting, ddosing, and general disrupting might prove interesting too.

we just need the people organized for this first, that's the hard part. that will probably have to happen outside the internet first though.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago

The web is still heavily centralized.

[-] bobzer@lemmy.zip 21 points 4 days ago

It's also much bigger than it was back in the day.

Even a fraction of a percent of people using decentralized services is probably bigger than the early web ever was.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

it is. it won't change overnight though.

[-] anon5621@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Let start from root of problem. Network with name internet entirely centralized and controlled by specific companies and people.

[-] hash@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago

If someone has a suggestion/link on how a decentralized web grows past DNS I'm all ears.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 10 points 4 days ago

Something like Lemmy could form a pretty good foundation. Onion routing already has created a "parallel internet" that depends 0% on DNS, and Lemmy instances would federate today (with whitelisted federation) via /etc/hosts with no DNS involved. It wouldn't work well, it would have problems, but if someone actually tried to make it work moderately well, the whole model of "admins running servers which it's your problem to get connected to, and then they know how to federate to each other because all the admins talk with each other" could work itself around over time into something that actually had some pretty strong robustness to it.

There are other attempts (Holepunch, Freenet, all that jazz), but actually Tor and Fedi things probably have the best claims to being able to turn into something realistic that didn't need DNS, over time. You just couldn't talk to it until you set your machine up to be able to get the initial connection going, but that's not fatal, the whole internet used to be a lot like that way back when.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
203 points (95.5% liked)

Privacy

40410 readers
618 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS