106

Everyone should be familiar with Marx’s essential criticisms of capitalism.

In summary, while constant capital (machines, workhouses, and such) is a necessary factor for production, it produces no profit. Profit only comes from variable capital (labor). With automation, less labor and hence less value goes into each good. Increased productivity means that more use values, but those commodities are cheaper in real value*.

It’s not true that more useful goods means less labor is necessary. In the commodity economy where valorization in the highest aim, there can never be enough work. While socialized production would negate this horrible fact, capitalism always wants more labor to exploit.

Yet, the market compels continual automation to give individual capitalists an edge. This process leads to less and less value going into goods and more and more constant capital compared to variable capital. Even if the gross mass of profit grows (which is what the capitalist cares about), the relative profit from production perpetually decreases. And the problem of too much stuff calls for destruction: planned obsolescence, destruction of goods while people have needs unmet, and, of course, wars.

*with inflation, l monetary wealth increases quantitatively without real wealth increasing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] miz@hexbear.net 15 points 4 days ago

Falling Rate of Profit | zhenli真理

(conclusion after all the maths and setup)

Assuming the rate of exploitation remains the same, once other businesses adopt this same machines, profits for all businesses will end up going down. At first, adopting this new machines gives Firm A an advantage to undersell his competitors. But by doing so, unintentionally, he causes his own profits to decline.

This is another cause of the concentration of capitals. Imagine if, for example, Firm C, after going bankrupt, was purchased by Firm A, which incorporated its laborers and machines. By incorporating Firm C into Firm A, Firm A could incorporate its new machines into Firm C, raising its profitability to be the same as Firm A. Even though the rate of profit would have been unchanged, the absolute profits would increase, as there would be less capitalists to pay dividends to, yet more capital employed.

The concentration of capitals therefore offsets the falling rate of profits. Every time the falling rate of profits leads to an economic crisis in capitalist countries, it is typically resolved through an increase in the concentration of capitals.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago

@FunkyStuff@hexbear.net @Nakoichi@hexbear.net this piece, I think, supports both of your comments in thread and has quantitative examples

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
106 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13958 readers
844 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS