134
many such cases! (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ratboy@hexbear.net 37 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Seriously hating the take on this website right now that if anyone says anything slightly critical of him that we are doomers or wreckers or whatever the fuck. Does the concept of critical support just fly out the window? Do people not see that being so rigid and resorting to fucking name calling amounts to similar behavior of the blue MAGA crowd? Were they even old enough to vote in the 2020 elections and actually remember what the vibe was like for AOC and Bernie? Do they think us groaning on this website will influence votes? Idk.

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago

people would probably have more measured responses if wankers weren't all fell-for-it-again-award over literally every single thing the guy does that they disagree with

still waiting to see what he does after the election because giving a shit before then is a waste of time lol

[-] ratboy@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

In the last struggle session I saw a lot of insults being hurled and gnashing of teeth towards skeptical people who were replying pretty respectfully. And since the very beginning when he won the primary, perhaps even before that, this intense defensiveness was present even though no one was really criticizing the guy until he started capitulating. So nah, its not about that IMO.

Idk why people need to take it as a personal attack and defend him for every shitty concession he makes, that's Democrat behavior. Until this guy came up it seems like Mamdani stans were on here were handing the fell-for-it-again-award out to everyone who is to the right of them as well, but now suddenly they just go feral. What were these people's rhetoric towards police before Mamdani came on the scene? It just really really feels like a lot of people are only willing to see what he is doing 54D chess instead of, idk, maintaining hope but also acknowledging that some of what he's doing now is sus.

I think I feel safe to say that most of us skeptics, including myself, really want to see if he sticks to his guns when he wins and we hope he does. but it seems that people think that if you aren't 100% behind him, you're 100% against him and want him to lose which is fucking ridiculous. That's mostly what I take issue with, not the fuckin dude himself, it's peoples behaviors around him and throwing any critical beliefs about electoralism out the window.

sorry if I seem mad at you ratboy i'm not I'm mad at being called a liberal by OP

[-] ratboy@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago

Nah it's all good, I use the Royal "you" all the time lol. I appreciate your clarification though

I see what you're saying even if I personally think that "we are doing the cops work for them" is a bit of a reach.

Yeah he's not in office, but I kinda feel like all politicians and candidates should be held to task every step of the way. If we don't, then what happens? People only hoot and holler with joy and support him no matter what until he's elected, and then recognizing that hes gotten nothing but support even as he backtracks publicly, wouldnt it make sense for him to think that the softening up strategy is how he should keep moving since there was no criticism of it before? I personally would be more vocal about him needing to earn my vote and stick to his principals instead of just forgoing my vote altogether if I did hear criticisms like these.

I have also seen the argument that if he sticks to his guns and doesn't backpedal publicly to the establishment that that would hurt his chances. But what do they even have to do with that? It's the people that are voting, why give so much power to wall street or whatever the fuck. If people were gonna be bought off they would have already, and I really doubt that his popularity has surged due to his rubbing elbows with Blackrock and complimenting the police.

Also I agree with you about this post in particular, that not every single little thing should be scrutinized so heavily but I think it's pretty difficult not to, especially with the whole Bernie Sanders thing back in the day, combined with just.... The history of politics in general

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
134 points (92.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13964 readers
645 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS