1

About page says they formed during the 2024 protests of the DNC over Gaza, and they are affiliated with the International Socialist League.

I doubt there were no trot parties at those protests. Why form another party? (Please spare me the "because they're trots")

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There's like a dozen or so different post-ISO groups, I can't really keep them all straight. Instead of re-writing the same "where we stand" with minor variations, I'd like to see them all publish a paragraph or two on what their strategy is, why it requires forming yet another group, and why this won't end up as another useless struggling sect in 10 or 20 years. I would assume that most of them have given those questions a lot of thought given their history, but none ever seem to come out and say it

[-] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

My question is, if they're ideologically similar enough to openly collaborate then why not merge? The whole point of democratic centralism and having a vanguard party is defeated when there's a dozen different vanguard parties.

My suspicion is they're controlled by small cliques that don't want to risk subjecting themselves to another clique. DSA is full of "post-trots" who've recognize this absurd pattern.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14125 readers
732 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS