view the rest of the comments
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
You are the worst poster on this website. The context of the comment was me criticizing China for being revisionist and non-interventionist! Why would you think then that I agree that they are "too socialist"? Are you really this inept at understanding and parsing information? You just have debate-brain and want to do gotchas with out of context clipping of my comments
That is true.
Were too socialist. You do clearly say that their modern position is an over-correction. You nonetheless did say they were "too socialist." As-written, you were ceding to their framing of the issue even if you still criticized their response to it.
Idk, maybe you just didn't express that part of your comment the way you intended. What motivation would I possibly have to be actively deceptive apropos of nothing? That doesn't make any sense, I don't have anything against you, despite the name-calling and such that you continue to direct at me.