830
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] artifex@piefed.social 134 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There are groups of designers who have the job of making symbols and systems that can survive for an extremely long time. One of their tasks was to design “signage” that might let generations thousands of years in the future not go poking around in nuclear waste yards. But the more crazy deadly and dangerous you make an artifact look, the more those future scientists are going to want to get into them.

This is not a place of honor

[-] dwemthy@lemmy.world 106 points 1 week ago
[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 25 points 1 week ago

Better off writing "this place is cursed and will kill those that enter"

[-] SnowmenMelt@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

This guy never watched Indiana Jones

[-] mech@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago

They wrote that on the entrance to the pyramids. It didn't discourage anyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JohnWorks@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 week ago

The nuclear spike deterrent field has been a favorite of mine

[-] Thunderbird4@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

This one looks cool, and I think that’s its biggest problem. It’s clearly a massive, man-made structure with no obvious purpose, yet with striking visual impact. To the hypothetical future civilization that is unaware of the dangerous nuclear waste, it basically begs to be investigated.

[-] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

man-made structure with no obvious purpose

Probably something religious.

[-] Rooster326@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah because desecrating religious sanctuaries has stopped humanity thus wait

[-] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh, I meant it more in the sense how archeologists/historians often say something was used for some religious or ritual purposes when they can't come up with a better explanation. See for example Stonehenge or roman dodecahedrons. There was also the idea for an atomic priesthood which would be charged with keeping the knowledge about nuclear waste sites.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

At least with Stonehenge it makes sense to group it in with religious worship of some type since it matches known human actions both historical and modern. As for Roman dodecahedron my money is still on it just being a nick nack, an expensive one but a nick nack none the less.

[-] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

Roman dodecahedrons were the NFTs of ancient times.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Numberone@startrek.website 8 points 1 week ago

Some real Hyperion Shit going on here. Anyone from the web should prolly move on...😳

[-] Rooster326@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bro of course Excalibur is under the field of death. Where else would you hide something so powerful?

Hop in, let's go

Oh man imagine jumping out of a plane and ramming one of those up your ass at full speed.

Sploosh.

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 5 points 1 week ago

Become the torus

[-] Rooster326@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you are falling out of plane at full speed with no pant on.

You have bigger problem

[-] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 week ago

I watched a documentary about that: Into Eternity

What I thought was interesting about the film was the balance between entertaining a fantastical vision of some future explorer stumbling across the radioactive site, and the mundanity of most of the actual work.

One of the engineers said something like: "When we seal this up with so much concrete, there's no way you're getting in here without machinery. We should be more concerned about a future civilization that comes back here for radioactive materials when they've exhausted all other natural sources"

And then there's a whole section of the film about rules-lawyering the storage site. The dump was chartered by the Finish government to seal waste "for all time", and the engineers were mad that nothing is truly permanent.

[-] alteredraccoon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Man this would be such a killer start or premise for a sci fi book

This place is a message... and part of a system of messages... pay attention to it!

Sending this message was important to us. We considered ourselves to be a powerful culture. This place is not a place of honor... no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here... nothing valued is here.

What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us. This message is a warning about danger. The danger is in a particular location... it increases towards a center... the center of danger is here... of a particular size and shape, and below us.

The danger is still present, in your time, as it was in ours.

The danger is to the body, and it can kill. The form of the danger is an emanation of energy.

The danger is unleashed only if you substantially disturb this place physically. This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah iirc the absolute best solution proposed was to not put any markings at all and bury it deep enough that any future civilization advanced enough to get to it will probably realize what it is long before they actually get to it.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was thinking about this and their thinking was way too complicated. The symbol you need is bones. Bones are always associated with death and decay because after death, bones are the thing that's left.

And yes I know they thought of it but I think their dismissal of it is wrong. Their counter argument that it was once a symbol of something else by some culture, therefore. But again by its very nature it's associated with death. Any society capable of this excavation is also capable of thinking "hmm what did they mean? outside of our own culture of course" and will quickly figure out it's bad.

[-] artifex@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Take a skull-and-crossbones. It might be taken to mean danger or poison. Or it might be taken to mean pirates or treasure. And if the future explorers did connect it with danger or poison, why wouldn't they also just think it was maybe a superstition meant to keep outsiders from getting "the good stuff," like the curses that were sealed into ancient Egyptian tombs?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why did pirates use it? Because it's "give us your shit or you die." Aka it was a symbol of death.

I think your fear is more likely with the current ominous but doesn't tell you why message (if the language part is lost).

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah, a future civilization finds a field covered in spikes. "I wonder what that's guarding. Must be something good!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago

Yeah, Carl Sagan was like "skull and crossbones"

But of course everyone else wanted to over-engineer it, so you get proposed solutions like encoding messages in the DNA of plants, and color-changing cats with an accompanying viral song that no one's ever heard of twelve years later... 🤦‍♀️

Like, guys, if people today can't even figure out what it means, then it's not a universal and enduring message.

And then some of the suggestions would only serve to make it a glaringly obvious archaeological dig site.

Skull and crossbones is about as universal as you can get. Maybe some atomic diagrams and radiation symbols, and written warnings in as many languages as possible, just in case people still understand them. And a giant slab that someone could only drill through deliberately, requiring heavy equipment.

I can't believe these were supposedly some of the smartest people in the world, and yet they made the mistakes of assuming that future civilizations would be hyperintelligent and thoroughly inquisitive, while also not understanding any symbols from our era and being likely to avoid areas designed to seem ominous. As if egyptologists today respect the warnings on ancient tombs.

And yet they overlooked the skull and crossbones because it seemed too obvious. The whole point is that it's supposed to be obvious!!!

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Atomic diagrams would be good for advanced societies, but societies in the bronze age or middle age advancment are the ones that we have to worry about. They won't understand atomic phyiscs but they are capable of excavation. Any fancy symbols might just intrigue them.

I think they underestimated the intelligence of possible future societies. Any society advanced enough to excavate this will be intelligent enough to ask "what does this symbol logically mean". They won't be limited to the 'bad-vibes' that the current ideas are heavy on (language aside).

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago

What about when the time of Mammals is done, and the next inhabitant has a chitinous exoskeleton? I'm not sure they'd recognize bones as a sign of this place being dangerous.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's just bones of a different nature. Any society capable of large excavation will quickly figure it out.

[-] RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

Technically yes, but in the context of symbols (which is what this is about) it doesn't work.

If you stumbled upon a sign with a bug exoskeleton, you'd think "ah yes, this means death"?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mech@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

The number one site archeologists are interested in is a graveyard. Because it tells you a lot about the people buried there.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Rusty@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

There was a conference about this and Carl Sagan was invited, but couldn't come. He sent a letter suggesting to do just that - skull and bones symbol.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

The symbol you need is bones. Bones are always associated with death and decay because after death, bones are the thing that’s left.

I think the only way to get it taken seriously is to include depictions of the site and depictions of what radiation sickness looks like.

Make like a 100 page comic that starts with someone opening a cask and removing a fuel element, then dying days later, the element leaving contamination, which kills someone else months later, causes birth defects, etc until it's returned.

You're not going to scare a society into never investigating something, but you might be able to convince them to put it back and bury it again after they realize the predictions are accurate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

There's also a song to accompany genetically-engineered cats that change colors when exposed to radioactive material

https://youtu.be/amn3kn0XPLQ

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Put it out of reach of humans without advanced tech. Under 2km of antarctic ice, in a deep sea trench, things like that. We are not talking millions of years, only a few thousand. And in case of accidents, water/ice is a great radiation blocker.

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
830 points (98.9% liked)

Funny

13102 readers
1183 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS