502
Anon makes some changes (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 148 points 2 weeks ago

Cold shower? There are no bonus points for effort. Just take a shower if you can.

Extra levels of suffering suck and don't add anything to the experience. Basic self care is a good start. Trying to prove something to a straw man in the mind is silly.

[-] skyline2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 96 points 2 weeks ago

Probably got the idea from the manosphere. That being said, actually sticking to that particular habit is something to be proud of, and is completely harmless... when you are that low, anything you can be proud of is a win.

[-] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 11 points 1 week ago

the manosphere

What about Seneca? Stoicism? What do they have to do with "the manosphere"?

Cold showers feel great.

[-] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

You're not wrong, but we're talking about pond scum here. I doubt there was much Seneca involved

[-] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

4chan is a bit of a manosphere hotspot. It's why some people's alarm bells are ringing about the nofap-part, too. If we assume that the post isn't actually real (as is common on 4chan), it might even be straight-up manosphere-derived nofap propaganda.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There is some evidence that taking cold showers is materially beneficial. If you don't have some underlying heart condition and can handle them, they're not bad, and they'll save on electricity/gas. The "nofap" thing is what concerns me, since that's a very "manosphere" concept with no middle ground between healthy sexuality and a crippling masturbation addiction (IIRC the former sometimes comes with crazy, unsubstantiated benefits in the fiction of the manosphere).

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 39 points 2 weeks ago

Sexual shame is used to control people. It's always a big red flag

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Its only 5 days. Thats a fine amount to not fap. The reason its pushed it cause these porn addicted cunts are fapping like 5 times a day.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't know why you're being downvoted so heavily. I agree that five days isn't some brutal, or even abnormal, act of chastity. It's moreso that "nofap" has connotations beyond just breaking an unhealthy masturbation addiction, and because everyone's healthy status quo is different, keeping track of a specific number of days since you jorked your pork isn't a great metric of how someone's dealing with addiction. What's a lot more important is how you're approaching it; are you being mindful in the moment, or are you just doing it for a quick hit?

Recovering drug addicts will treat number of days since their last hit as a metric for success, but usually, e.g. with alcohol or nicotine, there isn't a healthy upside to the object of their addiction like masturbation. "Nofap" basically does treat it like something strictly detrimental, and it stigmatizes something that's normal, ironically probably coming with some mental health implications of its own (in a similar way that religious stigma against it often does).

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That article doesn't say "cold showers are good for you!" it says "well, they aren't going to necessarily kill you, but watch out if you have these health conditions. I bet we can brainstorm some bullshit health benefits."

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I bet we can brainstorm some bullshit health benefits.

Dude, jesus christ. The Cleveland Clinic is a real, nonprofit medical institution. A professional writer consulted a (named, he's right there) medical doctor for this. There's compelling enough evidence elsewhere to support what this article is saying. Linked is a 2025 PLoS One systematic review and meta-analysis for cold-water immersion (CWI), including cold showers; more research is needed, but the authors at least make a conclusion in favor of CWIs, which says a lot for this type of paper.

Can you please get off your Dunning–Kruger high horse for five seconds and stop contributing to the science denialism that's unraveling society? I take scalding hot showers; not everything has to be an attack you have to defend against.


Also:

That article doesn’t say “cold showers are good for you!”

Motherfucker, the section header after the introductory paragraph literally reads: "Why cold showers are good for you". Was your problem that they missed the exclamation point or something?

[-] rapchee@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

isn't cold water better for the skin? at least it feels like it, when i do it once ever few years

[-] Sirence@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

Hot water damages the skin barrier. While cold water is better, lukewarm is fine for most people, especially since cold water won't be able to rinse shampoo and other products out of your hair properly.
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/2/298

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

An ice plunge or rolling around in the snow both feel great afterwards. Really gets the endorphins going. The same applies to cold showers, although I usually do that only when I can get back into a 100°C sauna immediately after. That's double the endorphin rush.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I enjoy how I feel after an ice shower or bath, but I hate doing it lol

[-] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago

I stick to hot shower + cold hair wash. Perfect for waking up and better for hair care. Win win.

this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
502 points (97.4% liked)

Greentext

8062 readers
872 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS