24
Federation be like (hexbear.net)

Too obvious to be funny, but i still wanted to draw a shitpost.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Doug@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

Me: You guys acted more aggressive in my instance than this comic portrays

You: Both sides. Concern troll....

Posted an example elsewhere. Someone being a far bigger piece of shit doesn't mean you are incapable of being kinda crappy yourself. We're very far from anything resembling a both sides thing here

[-] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

The one example you posted elsewhere (that I can find in your posts, you still won't like or make it clear for others) is this comment which is a bit ranty and online for my personal tastes, but I don't have any problem with the content of.

More importantly though, cherry picking the most (ironically) all caps reply you got here is not the same as providing evidence of Hexbear users "acting much more aggressively in my instance". So you still haven't provided anything to back up the claim you've made all over this thread. So yeah, plenty of people here will rightly doubt your sincerity.

[-] Doug@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

I didn't link anything specifically for two reasons. For one, I didn't feel obligated to go sifting through a post I didn't especially enjoy the first time. For two, it was an effort to meet the same energy as "check the modlog".

Was I right in either of those, maybe not. I'll own that.

On the other hand if you don't have any notable issues with that comment I have my doubts you'd be more critical of anything I've seen on my instance.

But at the end of the day we're all different people with different insights and opinions. Am I wrong about how a comment reads to me and you're right? Is it the other way around? Neither. We're both right about how it reads to us. But that's not likely to change how you view my sincerity.

[-] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

I've made my point with a good faith addendum on the slightest off-chance I'm wrong about your intentions, so I refer you to that, and with that I'm disengaging.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13490 readers
647 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS