189
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zephyreks@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

But these people see no accountability. Wikipedia doesn't have a mechanism of accountability against these anonymous bad actors.

[-] ferristriangle@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Accountability for what? Failing to delete an article?

Accountability is for people who wield power. The review process denied them the power to delete the article. That seems plenty sufficient to me.

[-] zephyreks@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

The guy has nothing to really tie him to the action so he can just go on the next post and do the same thing. Eventually it'll get through, because Wikipedia isn't staffed by perfect people. That's a bad thing.

[-] ferristriangle@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Ah, so we're going with "it would be bad if this scenario had a different outcome, so we're just going to pretend this scenario actually represents the bad outcome that didn't happen so I can rationalize being mad about this non-issue."

[-] zephyreks@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

Ah y'know what that's a fair point

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
189 points (99.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13940 readers
650 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS