506
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago

What a shit article. All she did was support the Palestinian cause and now they're putting shit in her mouth (no pun intended).

I don't like how the narrative is being forced in this conflict. They are clearing the way for something very sinister. We're about to witness a western sanctioned genocide. There's no way Israel is letting this opportunity go.

Something is going to happen soon in the West Bank too, I call it.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

Look man, you can support Palestine, but telling the soldiers to turn their phones horizontally for better execution videos of civilians is a bit much.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago
[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

She did, but she removed it https://twitter.com/miakhalifa/status/1710663220619313397

Can someone please tell the freedom fighters in Palestine to flip their phones and film horizontal
— Mia K. (@miakhalifa) October 7, 2023
[-] i_ben_fine@lemmy.one 21 points 1 year ago

So... she didn't say that. Those words are very different.

[-] atetulo@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Hmm. That's actually not that bad.

It's nice to see original sources for things. Everyone likes to twist and distort reality to support their agenda.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who are the Palestinian freedom fighters she's referring to?

Edit: She clarifies she means the civilians. It's an awful choice of wording, but I can give her the benefit of the doubt.

[-] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

She said "Palestinian freedom fighters" - it's telling that when people read that they think she means Hamas.

[-] FMT99@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Good ol' Dubya set the stage for this 20 years ago. Yer either fer us or yer agin us. Either you support every thing we do without question or you support terrorism.

[-] doubletwist@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

The stage was set long before him. He was just one step in the plan.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bruh. The stage was set by British cunts in the early 20th century.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

you mean another Western sanctioned genocide?

China with Uyghurs has been going on for a while with no response from the west.

Saudi Arabia, UAE etc wih Yemen, the weapons were sold for ot by the west.

[-] wahming 39 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure how you consider the Uyghurs a western sanctioned genocide, if anything it's only the western media that is drawing any attention to it whatsoever.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

no sactions though, are there?

[-] wahming 15 points 1 year ago

So... The west is the only one who gives a damn, but somehow it's their fault because they're not doing enough?

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

does the west give a damn though?

media reporting it I don't really qualify as giving a damn.

I would also wager that if I go out on the street here in slovakia and start asking people about it most people would look at me like an idiot and say, WTF is "Uyghurs"?

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Slovakia is like, the most eastern of the West

[-] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The word sanction is an antonym of itself. You're disingenuously arguing semantics.

Sanction: noun Authoritative permission or approval that makes a course of action valid.

Sanction: noun The penalty for noncompliance with a law or legal order.

When people use the term "sanctioned genocide," they are almost assuredly using the first definition.

The Uyghur Genocide is not sanctioned by the west because, unlike Gaza and Yemen, this genocide doesn't have the support of most western governments.

The lack of economic sanctions against China does not make the Uyghur genocide a sanctioned one. Despite using the same word.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"Evil wins when good men do nothing" or is that notbhow the saying goes?

I am not arguing semantics, it's just my view that the lack of sanctions by the west for China for commiting genocide is about as good as sanctioning it.

I don't think that's a far fetched view, I think you are the one arguing semantics, or the exact meaning of words rather than realizing the lack of action against evil is about as good as an endorsement of it.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's a sad commentary on the state of education nowadays that I also initially assumed that you were dumb enough to not know the difference between "sanctioned genocide" and "applying sanctions"

I've had enough "well regulated militia" arguments that it's scarred me

[-] doubletwist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Of course not. We can't risk losing out on cheap Chinese crap for Prime Day!

[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

There's a difference between just looking the other way and actively endorsing it.

The West is 100% backing Israel and they're not letting this chance go. Palestininans are going to be killed and deported, including Israeli Arabs. I call it. Something will happen in the West Bank soon or even in Israel itself and then Israel will come up with its own "final solution". We'll definitely see mass expulsions. The propaganda machine is already clearing the road ahead.

And when we see what we were actually endorsing we'll try to take back our support but it'll be too late. Their blood will be in our hands.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There's a difference between just looking the other way and actively endorsing it.

let's agree to disagree. I unfortunately have this nice example from history where they looked he other way, until they couldn't.

maybe you have heard of it it's like one of those rare sequels that's a bigger box office hot than the first installments WW something

[-] crackajack@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

To be fair to the US, Biden stopped any more arms export to Saudi because of the actions in Yemen. Although, one could argue that the Saudi-led military intervention in Yemen is a magnum opus of a clown show for Saudi (until Russian invasion of Ukraineeclipsed it of course), so I think Biden thought there isn't really any more point to bet on a losing horse then.

[-] Aleric@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

These comments are full of people spreading objectively false narrative. It's concerning. Are people in Lemmy intentionally spreading misinformation or do they think what they're saying is true? Either way, it's concerning.

[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Lemmy is not so bad actually. It's Reddit that is scary. You have people calling for genocide being upvoted to the sky consistently. If someone denounces the violent speech and dehumanization, hell even just asking for some cool heads, they're downvoted to oblivion.

[-] Elric@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That is enough of a sin though

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
506 points (89.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12311 readers
461 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS