249
GUSANO CONFIRMED (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The vast majority of English speakers use "racism" to mean "prejudice or hate based on race," which covers a lot more ground than structural racism. There isn't a great reason to try and redefine racism to exclusively mean structural racism, either, because individual prejudice based on skin color is bad, too.

When people see prejudice based on skin color, the response shouldn't be "whoa whoa whoa, maybe this is OK, depending on who has power here." The response should be that prejudice based on skin color is bad in any situation, but is especially harmful where the group exercising that prejudice has structural power to hurt the target group. Some types of prejudice being worse than others does not mean there is an excusable form of prejudice. It definitely doesn't mean that the less harmful forms aren't prejudice at all.

[-] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

Ah, more of the liberalism. You know there's structural racism, you know it is fundamentally different from this "prejudice based on skin color" nonsense, you know that people are not aware enough of that ignorance and like a liberal counterrevolutionary, you argue in favor of keeping them ignorant on this. Why? How fragile do you have to be to get insulted over the term cracker? I'm white myself, i've never felt the slightest bit insulted by the word. And unlike your privileged ass, i know what actual oppression is, what it means to be targeted by actual slurs. Your position is laughable and reactionary.

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

you argue in favor of keeping them ignorant on this

Here's what I actually said:

If some chud tries to equate cracker with the n-word that's a fight worth having: persuadable people instinctively know we're right and you can educate people by explaining why.

[-] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

Yes, and after that you have spent several posts arguing why we should do the exact opposite and value the misleading idea that cracker is in some way comparable to the nword, you disingenuous debatebro weasel.

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

value the misleading idea that cracker is in some way comparable to the nword

If some chud tries to equate cracker with the n-word that's a fight worth having

jesse-wtf

[-] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

You continue to argue in bad faith like the cahuvinist redditor turd gourmet you are, quoting the one paragraph ITT where you werne't completely full of shit and pretending you didn't type out the entire rest of your replies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
249 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13558 readers
828 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS