163
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by President_Obama@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SkibidiToiletFanAcct@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

whatever, Kasparov is so full of himself, he's not even that good at Chess. I could beat him if someone told me what the rules of chess are.

[-] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

AFAIR chess is mostly memorization of "openings", that's why computers can be good at it pretty easily

[-] NewAcctWhoDis@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Memorized openings only get you so far, and even then there are branches and deviations. There's a reason why repeat games are so rare.

Chess engines generally aren't very good at evaluating openings, while high-level human players can memorize the theory for a large number of openings (and engines can have them hard-coded). The reason engines are so much better than humans is the rest of the game.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
163 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13690 readers
268 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS