385
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

It was not immediately clear why the sedan smashed into an SUV that was part of the motorcade. The driver was surrounded by agents who had their guns drawn.

A sedan smacked into a Secret Service vehicle that was part of President Joe Biden's motorcade in Delaware on Sunday night.

Following the crash, U.S. Secret Service agents whisked Biden into a vehicle.

Agents quickly surrounded the sedan with guns drawn and aimed at its driver, who had his hands up. The cause of the crash was not immediately clear.

Special Agent Steve Kopek, a Secret Service spokesperson, said the vehicle that struck was securing Biden's motorcade route.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 131 points 11 months ago

If this was just a DUI or something, the driver is going to have a very very bad time.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 109 points 11 months ago

A car accident is horrifying enough. Can you imagine realizing you just hit the presidential motorcade? In Delaware?

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Is Delaware worse for some reason?

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 87 points 11 months ago

Just the realization that you're in Delaware is enough.

Like, who even lives in Delaware?

[-] BrandonMatrick@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago
[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

So...lottsa people /s

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

I remember the first time I met a person from Delaware. I was shocked. I think I said to them, "I didn't know anyone actually lived there."

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Maybe we just don't know what they do about Delaware and that's why they never leave. It's a paradise beyond paradises.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 10 points 11 months ago

I'll have to know, there are dozens of us

[-] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago
[-] KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space 3 points 11 months ago

Can you even call that living?

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago

All the corporations ever. Wonder if they count for the population since they became people.

[-] NightGaunts@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago
[-] kool_newt@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago
[-] Resonosity@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Delamain. Wake up, Samurai

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 11 months ago
[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

I believe it’s Biden’s home state, so people around there probably love him. Can’t imagine being very popular with your neighbors once news gets out.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago

On the other hand, the driver probably has a uniquely high chance of a presidential pardon. Seeing how the president is already aware of his case.

[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

The president could only ask the delaware governor to grant one.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Good eye skimmed over the Delaware part. Assuming it was a DUI (and not an intentional attack) it'd be state jurisdiction.

[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Yeah, he might catch some federal flack, but it seems most of his issues will be state affairs unless this wasn't just hitting the worst possible car.

Even if he were a drunk terrorist, the feds would handle the attack, and as long he isn't charged federally (if one even could be), the state can still slap an everyday DUI there.

[-] CluckN@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

If he gets pardoned and it happens again can he use the same pardon twice?

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

Non-joke answer: Pardons are for a person's actions not the person in general. He would need a second pardon.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Thats an interesting distinction :) Can you talk more about that?

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Not sure what exactly you want me to touch on. But pardons can't be for future actions.

Let's say you rob a bank and get pardoned. Having received that pardon doesn't mean you can go rob that bank again free of charge.

If you had robbed that bank again after getting pardoned you'd face prison time. But if the president happens to believe in ~~second~~ third chances and grants you a second pardon for the second robbery you could walk free.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Gotcha, ya I didn't think it was like omnibus/universal immunity for future offences aha. That would be like...presidential immunity and even that's not supposed to be a forever thing, shouldn'teven be allowed during or should be heavily qualified

Edit: found it interesting that pardons can actually halt the prosecutorial effort altogether, like prior to a verdict. Maybe there should be a cooling off period like requiring all oending litigation to play out and then by then see where everybody's at.

Justice delayed/disrupted ⚖️ right?

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Yeah the idea behind a pardon is that the head executive is basically saying that you’ve been punished enough and that no further prosecution will occur. It’s similar to how they can stay a death penalty. But the big downside is that accepting a pardon means accepting legal guilt. You can’t keep fighting a case saying you weren’t ever guilty.

For an example of how far pardons go look at Nixon. The case was still being built, and Ford (idiotically) deemed that proceeding with a trial of a former president over election misdeeds would do too much damage to the nation’s trust in its political system. Nixon didn’t stand trial. Nixon only pled guilty by acceptance of the pardon. But because of that, had he been able to run again (he’d hit his term limit) and tried, he would’ve had a court case over if his crimes prohibited him from running again, same as if he’d gone to prison for them.

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

If it doesn't work for farts, probably not

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Would this be considered a federal offense? Seems like a local thing. The president can only pardon federal crimes.

[-] First@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

That's not true, he can also pardon his French.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

There's a couple ways they could make this a federal offence depending on the circumstances, ranging from destruction of federal property (assuming Biden was in a gov car) to attempted assassination of the active US president. Again depending on the circumstances.

[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

Immediately disappeared to a black site.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah I was hoping for an update, but I just realized the Secret Service is going to be up this guy's ass like a colonoscopy for a long time before we hear anything.

[-] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 11 months ago

Decidedly one of the worst hangovers anyone's ever had. "What happened last ni-oh my God"

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

To be fair, he shouldn't suffer any greater punishment than if he had hit into anyone else.

this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
385 points (97.1% liked)

News

23311 readers
1230 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS