47
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TAG@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

They have a perfectly good explanation in the first paragraph of the article:

it has fans wondering if a Nintendo Selects-style repackaging of these titles

[-] atocci@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

What's the point of those sorts of re-releases? Are the contents any different from the game that was on store shelves previously?

[-] Peekystar@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago

Nope; pretty sure that the Nintendo Selects are just discounted physical releases with a fancy border on their front-facing box art, historically done for some of the best-selling titles on the given console (thus far seen on the Wii, 3DS and Wii U).

[-] picandocodigo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

And they did this before with "Player's Choice" on SNES, Game Boy, Nintendo 64, Game Cube and Game Boy Advance.

[-] Kelly@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

And "Nintendo Selects" on Wii U, Wii, & 3DS

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

It's to show case best sellers. Same reason the PS1 did it, and every console since. Also the same reason books have editions that say bestseller on them.

[-] markv@mastodon.social 2 points 8 months ago

@atocci @picandocodigo @TAG I’d also add that Nintendo has a history / policy of never reducing the price of a game. So if Zelda is $59 at release, it will still be $59 three years later. This avoids people “waiting a year” for the price to drop - if you want the game, you might as well buy it at launch (unless you want to buy it second hand).

[-] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Not really true, they discount their games on the eshop all the time. And if you’re talking physical copies, Target and other stores have sales all the time too. It’s just not as good as Ubisoft lowering the price of their games to $20 after a month or whatever, so people bitch and moan.

[-] markv@mastodon.social 1 points 8 months ago

@Kiosade Both true and fair exceptions, just pointing out their general trend. Wasn’t trying to either bitch or moan 😅

The way I see it, they re-release games that continue selling well 3-4 years after the initial release at a lower price point so they can continue getting revenue from them without losing out to the 2nd hand market. I think many of their games continue selling much longer than typical AAA games.

[-] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Oh sorry, I wasn’t trying to say you were doing that, it’s just a thing I see quite often whenever this topic comes up.

And yeah, their games are generally pretty good, so they have staying power. This is compared to flavor of the month games where, once the general populace has had their fun with them, they die in a far-off corner, never to be heard of again.

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Back in the day of PS2 I remember the greatest hits copies used black and white manuals instead of color copies.

Now that manuals are gone I'm not sure how much different they'd be. Maybe including some DLC similar to a GOTY edition.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago

I've been saying for a long time that Nintendo clearly buys back and destroys unsold first party stock. That's why you can go search for a first party GameCube game and you'll be paying out the ass for a used copy. I guess it's their way of keeping their games popular and not have unopened copies all over the place

[-] TAG@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

That is a very bold assertion.

I just assume that the Nintendo first party games tend to sell well and sell for a long time, so when they stop getting manufactured, they all sell out and still have a bit of demand left that scoops up used copies. They are not making Madden or Call of Duty, which sell well for a year and then everyone is looking to sell last year's version.

[-] craftyindividual@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

The Disney of games companies.

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

The GameCube really didn't sell that well. They produced less stock overall, thus less supply compared with other systems like PS2.

When comparing with the ps2 specifically, it gets even more skewed as new ps2 games were still being made and released years after the ps3 came out. Not just new copies, but entirely new games.

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
47 points (84.1% liked)

Nintendo

18297 readers
153 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


The Legend of Zelda: Echoes of Wisdom | Sep 26 Super Mario Party Jamboree | Oct 17 Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS