107

A super-lib explains how the dems couldn't codify Roe for FIFTY fucking years. (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 46 points 2 years ago

No, they act based on donor approval, or Roe would have been codified long ago.

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 33 points 2 years ago

There’s plenty of dem donors that are pro-choice though. If anything, I think it’s because abortion access being in a precarious place created a narrative to keep the donations coming in.

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago

this it's a useful wedge issue for them to pretend to care about so they can beg for money. As long as it remains in limbo they can keep using it to beat that drum forever.