89
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Smeagolicious@hexbear.net 38 points 7 months ago

Second movie is much better about it, though they still refuse to use "jihad" as a term probably for burger reasons (it would send 80-90% of an american audience into a berserk state)

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 34 points 7 months ago

though they still refuse to use "jihad"

The Butlerian Kerfuffle.

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 24 points 7 months ago

The Butlerian Struggle Session...

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 19 points 7 months ago

The Outdoorian Cat Crusade

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 7 months ago

To be fair they don’t refrain from calling it a religious war. Though using the term “holy war” instead of jihad is most definitely to dumb it down for Americans who don’t know “jihad” is not just a term for islamic terrorism

[-] Smeagolicious@hexbear.net 8 points 7 months ago

For sure - the message is the same and the plot isn't harmed in any measurable way, just a kinda pointless/funny concession to the American audience

[-] Barabas@hexbear.net 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I mean, they also changed the "Long live the fighters" from the books where it is "Ya Hya Chouhada!".

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
89 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13509 readers
1510 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS