68
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

"The court gives a green light to a law that will upend the longstanding federal-state balance of power and sow chaos," liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a dissenting opinion. Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson also objected to the decision.

The majority did not explain its reasoning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

I have no idea what the law is on this and how it works. But the GOP could simply close that loophole. Even if the law wasn't really constitutional - it wouldn't matter at all. The law would have been exactly designed to get the imprimatur of at least 5 GOP people in black robes to say it is constitutional. And that's that.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

Well, here's the thing. Supreme Court can say what it wants, but they're not the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. Andrew Jackson figured this out through his intense commitment to being racist.

There will come a time in the not too distant future where a sitting president ignores a Supreme Court ruling. I'd prefer that be in service of good rather than evil.

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

a sitting president ignores a Supreme Court ruling

A GOP president could do it but a dem president never will.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Right. That's why I said it's even more unlikely than packing a court. The norms must be respected.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13931 readers
886 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS