277
submitted 6 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] soratoyuki@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Since no one apparently read the article, it's the Democrats doing this.

The Debt Collective named Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), and Rep. Rick Larsen (D-Wash.) as particularly responsible for the language.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

And since no one read the BILL, Ted Cruz is one of the people that cosponsored this. Of the 4 sponsors, Cruz is the only one that is actively campaigning against debt relief. Even Moran, the other Republican cosponsor, has pushed for debt relief for service members.

This smells of classic Cruz. He’s a petty little cunt and would totally sneak something like this into a routine authoritarian bill that no one is proofreading.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/1939/all-info

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

I find that really unlikely as both Schumer and Duckworth have called for debt cancellation by executive order and even if they were secretly opposed it's a good campaign issue that can be reliably blocked by the filibuster or the courts. I think it's just Debt Collective being a little loose with the definition of "responsible" to prompt outrage and more calls to the people who have power to do something (which is a good thing).

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

My money is on Ted Cruz. This article completely fails to mention that Cruz is one of the sponsors.

Also, Cruz is the ONLY sponsor who hasn’t supported student debt relief in some form, and the only sponsor that campaigns against it in public.

And, least we forget, he’s a sneaky little shit that loves to sneak stuff past people when they’re not paying attention.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

I've said it before and I'll say it again, vote both of them out.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Ted Cruz (R) is a cosponsor, and is the only sponsor that campaigns against student debt relief, and is a weasel that loves to sneak things in when no one is looking.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, hence why I said both, as in both parties

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I probably should have provided context. Of the two Democratic and two Republican sponsors, Cruz (R) is the one is actively campaigning against student debt relief in the press.

Also, of the people that voted for tanking Biden’s debt relief plan, only 3 were democrats. Tester, Manchin, and Sinema. The latter two are famously out of step with their party.

All in all, the Democratic Party has a track record of supporting student debt relief, and the Republican Party has a track record of opposing it. Also, of the people sneaking anti debt relief language in this bill, odd are is was the big anti-debt relief tea party republican.

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

A vote for neither of them is a vote for trump. The two party system needs to be changed.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

Which will never happen while we vote for either side

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
277 points (95.7% liked)

News

23161 readers
2751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS