112

It's the NYT - https://archive.ph/48YXJ

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 44 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I knew it was a waste of time but I decided I'd actually read the article. But by the fourth word I knew it was a loser.

The philanthropist Kathryn Murdoch has prioritized donations to environmental causes for more than a decade.

Yes, she's one of those Murdochs. She's Rupert Murdoch's daughter-in-law.

[-] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago

Straight to the pit.

[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Anyone who calls themselves a philanthropist I automatically assume is a pedophile freak who deserves to be shot. Not a coincidence it sounds and spells similarly to “phrenologist”

this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13447 readers
1066 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS