117

It's funny, if you go on most political subs on Reddit, a solid 3rd or more of posts are people asking "why do our opponents dumb and not agreeing with us when we are so smart and good?" (hexbear.net)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Sons_of_Ferrix@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

And 90% of the replies are people going "cuz they are dumb and bad!" and maybe like three guys heavily downvoted at the bottom trying to provide an actual explanation.

Not saying we NEVER get posts like that here. But the whole practice of making posts like these weekly/daily/hourly just screams insecurity to me. I feel like us HexBear commies are all pretty aware of why our opponents don't agree with us and don't need daily session of us all collectively reminding each other.

Edit: typo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, I'd say that it's true that we use a lot of these.

I think the qualitative difference is that there's grounds for a lot of what we accuse the other sides of, whereas this doesn't necessarily apply in the other direction (or they'll find the most unhinged PatSoc Hinkler and claim that this person is representative of all communists in order to argue the above.)

Another part of it is how much we use these terms in a strict sense. For example, I'd say that diehard Trump supporters are legitimately close to being cultists whereas I'd say that the vote blue no matter who crowd is "cult-like" in how they basically argue that the DNC cannot fail you, it can only be failed by you. But I'm not going to say that I legitimately believe that it's an actual cult. Same goes for liberal indoctrination; I might use the term "brainwashed" but I'm not actually arguing that they're legitimately brainwashed, it's just a hyperbolic way of referring to the level of indoctrination they have and it's useful as shorthand.