152

The New York Times does baby brain hasbara and pretends that an ideology is the same thing as a religion. (hexbear.net)

submitted 7 months ago by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://archive.ph/JHhaO

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] thisismyrealname@hexbear.net 40 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The students invoke historical issues of colonialism and apartheid.

colonialism and apartheid are things of the past, silly! don't believe your lying eyes, we don't have those anymore!

“Let’s take any other ethnic or religious minority,” said Eden Yadegar, a junior at Columbia. “Would you only accept them if they were willing to denounce an integral part of their religious or ethnic identity? The answer is absolutely not. So how come it’s OK to say, you know, we accept Jews, but only if you denounce your religious and social and ethnic connection to your homeland? It’s ridiculous.”

Zionism is obviously not an integral part of the Jewish identity, if it were there wouldn't be publicly Jewish anti-Zionists.

[-] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Would you only accept them if they were willing to denounce an integral part of their religious or ethnic identity?

If an integral part of their religion was committing genocide, yes I would absolutely not accept them. I'd probably say barbara-pit with them. Fortunately a lot of Jewish people have figured out how to be Jewish without the whole genocide thing. Wild how that works.

[-] Pentacat@hexbear.net 7 points 7 months ago

The argument that apartheid and genocide are vital aspects of Jewish identity is obviously trash, but if we take it seriously, doesn’t it contain an implicit argument that the Nazis conducted the holocaust in self-defense?