116
submitted 6 months ago by Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net to c/games@hexbear.net

HAVE SOME FUCKING PRIDE FFS LET YOUR DEVELOPERS EXPERIMENT WITH SOMETHING NEW

AAAAAA

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

I’m talking about gameplay and not story? I don’t know how you can look at game that got big because it was flashy, a big upgrade, good “AI”, in a large open world metroidvania, and say that is nothing like BotW.

Like yeah, BotW added more shit cuz… duh? Just like OoT added more to the game compared to previous Zelda games because 3D.

[-] booty@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

I’m talking about gameplay and not story?

Please elaborate. Neither the gameplay nor story of OOT are remotely similar to BOTW.

flashy, a big upgrade, good “AI”, in a large open world metroidvania

The only thing from your list that really has anything to do with the core elements of OOT is something that BOTW absolutely does not share. It simply is not a metroidvania or in any way similar to one.

[-] jaywalker@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

What is a metroidvania then? I always thought it was any action/platformer game that was gated by equipment or whatever (can't get to this location until you have the special item). That's exactly what BOTW is?

[-] laziestflagellant@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

There is no equipment gating in BOTW unless you're only counting the tutorial plateau?

You get your bread and butter abilities at the very start and then you get nothing else the entire rest of the game except completely optional sage abilities and elemental arrows in stores I guess? The only thing that gates story progression is the area quests.

[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

Maybe I’m just thinking of TotK which definitely was, thought you gained upgrades to the skills and stuff as you went to the mechs but it’s been ages and TotK is fresher in my mind. So idk.

[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

OOT had enemies with AI that seemed impressive at the time, it was the first 3D Zelda game, and graphics were impressive at the time so flashy & a big upgrade for sure. Also, definitely a large open world for the time, even if it was cheated with past/future being able to reuse some map, it worked for making it seem large, and you were free to go in whatever order and such.

As I responded to your other post, I may have misremembered BotW being more metroidvania due to TotK.

[-] booty@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago

It did have those things, yes, but they really aren't core elements of the game. By that logic Ocarina of Time is like F.E.A.R. Because it had impressive AI and graphics and it was 3D.

And Ocarina of Time really isn't an open world game, not in the modern sense that Breath of the Wild definitely is. It's a mostly linear level-based game with a big hub.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
116 points (100.0% liked)

games

20536 readers
456 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS