884
Eeeeee (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 157 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Kind of intentionally obtuse since they used eₑ as a variable and eₑₑ as another variable, and used (e-e) as an exponent a few times, which is basically the equivalent of multiplying by 1 in a fancy way. The first and last term also perfectly cancel out.

The same integral written in a saner form is:

integral from -e^e to e^e of (integral from -e^e to e^e of e^-(x^2+y^2)dy)dx

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 73 points 4 months ago

Wait... that's not an approximation at all! That equals exactly pi. If I understand the math correctly, it's effectively a formula for the area of a unit circle.

[-] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 67 points 4 months ago

That should be an approximation. To get exactly pi the range of both integrals should be from minus infinity to infinity like this. It's the integral of the 2D Gaussian, which is fairly known.

[-] cryoistalline@lemmy.ml 31 points 4 months ago
[-] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 months ago

And because it always bears repeating;

According to JPL’s Chief Engineer for Mission Operations and Science, Marc Rayman-

Let's go to the largest size there is: the known universe. The radius of the universe is about 46 billion light years. Now let me ask (and answer!) a different question: How many digits of pi would we need to calculate the circumference of a circle with a radius of 46 billion light years to an accuracy equal to the diameter of a hydrogen atom, the simplest atom? It turns out that 37 decimal places (38 digits, including the number 3 to the left of the decimal point) would be quite sufficient.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Technically you need another 20 digits if you want to get down to a Planck length. (57 digits in total)

[-] daqu@feddit.org 7 points 4 months ago

So the number 3 should be close enough for home use. Good to know. Thanks!

[-] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

As an engineer, I approve this message!

[-] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 0 points 3 months ago

My maths exam asked me to consider pi=5.

[-] vonxylofon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

"I will... consider it."

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You can quote with the “greater than” sign (>). Backticks mark text as source code.

> quote

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ah, you're right. I was thrown off by WolframAlpha saying the integral = π ≈ 3.1416 Both of those should be ≈

(x^2 + y^2)=1 is the equation for a unit circle, so it's definitely related. Just not quite how I thought.

[-] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Also the 2D gaussian integral is used to give an insight on why the 1D gaussian integral is sqrt of pi. Here is a video with cool visualization for anyone interested.

[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

“Fix” it with Lim as eee-> infinity (where eee is some other e-named variable)

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
884 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

11021 readers
3640 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS