63
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net to c/games@hexbear.net

i-think-that

But on the other hand, I don't want to take away from people's fun.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

I think there’s something to be said for remasters adding in quality of life features (fast travel points, quick saves, online play, accessibility features). But yeah, a lot of full on remakes are cash grabs.

[-] amberSuperMario@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 month ago

This may be an even spicier take than the OP but I think most of the time “quality of life” changes are unnecessary and can undermine deliberate game design choices. Adding accessibility features (actual accessibility, as in features that allow disabled people to enjoy games they otherwise would not be able to play, not accessibility in the way Consumers use it) are obviously good changes, but otherwise I don’t think added features in remakes often make for a better experience. Most games that get remade are games that were beloved in their day, and it’s not like those games got worse or anything, people just have different standards that lead them to expect a game from 20-30 years ago to play the same as one that came out today. And tbh, if I wanted to play games that feel like modern games, I would just play modern games…

load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
63 points (98.5% liked)

games

20425 readers
231 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS