120
submitted 1 month ago by happybadger@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

spoilerFour more Missouri healthcare workers are experiencing mild respiratory symptoms after coming in contact with a bird flu patient, health officials said Friday.

A total of six healthcare workers have now developed symptoms after having contact with the patient, who is the first confirmed person to contract the disease with no known animal exposure.

The patient has recovered, but the case is raising questions about potential human-to-human transmission of bird flu, which primarily affects animals.

The only worker who was tested for the virus had negative results, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said.

That worker, who was given a PCR test for the virus, had what was considered high-risk contact with the patient and later developed mild symptoms.

Another worker who had high-risk contact and three others who had low-risk contact were not tested during the time they experienced symptoms, according to the CDC.

"PCR testing would have been unreliable at the time of discovery of these individuals' prior symptoms," said the agency.

PCR testing, which can give results quickly, was common during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Along with the healthcare workers, one member of the patient's household developed symptoms, but also was not tested, according to the CDC.

All of the healthcare workers with symptoms provided blood samples for antibody testing, as well as the household contact, the CDC said.

The results of those tests remain unknown.

Bird flu, also known as avian influenza, is rare in humans. There have been 14 human cases of the viral disease in the US so far this year.

Missouri's handling of the only one with no known animal exposure has come under scrutiny.

Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, told the health publication STAT that he was concerned about how long Missouri was taking to figure out who else may have been infected by the original patient.

“Public health credibility is really on the line here,” Mr Osterholm said.

The 13 other cases in 2024 involved farm workers who had links to bird flu outbreaks on dairy or poultry farms.

The CDC continues to caution that the risk to the general public remains low.

But bird flu cases among cows have been on the rise in the US this year.

Since a March outbreak was first reported, cattle in 14 states have been affected, the CDC said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago

doomjak

Is there any way to interpret this information that doesn't conclude that the seal on human-to-human transmission is broken?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 month ago

It's possible that human-to-human transmission is still very difficult and unlikely without continual direct exposure. Healthcare workers are in constant contact with infected patients so they roll the dice over and over until, by pure chance, they get sick.

... I guess

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

I was trying to dig down deeper into the amount of cattle affected by avian flu since i feel "cattle in 14 states" is one of those CDC minimization attempts. I managed to find out 238 "herds" have been affected and the average herd in the us is 44 head. So 10k cattle (minimum?) and 20 million birds, and let's eduguess terrible protections for farm workers. Baby, we got a stew goin'!

[-] Sulvor@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I hope that they weren’t aware, cause if they were treating it as possible bird flu they should’ve been in head to toe PPE. Faceshield, mask, gown, gloves, booties.

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

I think it's more likely that the pro-covid brainworms have convinced them that wearing PPE is tyranny. Praise Nurgle.

[-] NoYouLogOff@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

This is Missouri, so it's likely.

[-] Sulvor@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, I don’t think so.

It is encouraging that it seems they have a pretty close eye on everyone who has been infected. It’s still possible they are able to contain this human-to-human strain and nobody else gets infected.

They would also need to cull whatever birds are possibly infected, and hope the strain hasn’t escaped.

If this strain is in wild bird populations I think we’re fucked. Look at how many people just one person infected.

That’s a lot of ifs. I would recommend people start masking if you’re not and look into additional forms of protection.

[-] Owl@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

Transmission being difficult and rare between humans is still possible, and I'd even say likely. Tiny outbreaks of weird crap happen and fizzle out all the time.

The current precautions being taken (ie: fuck all) mean it's inevitable that eventually one of these incidents will break out and become a pandemic. It's just not guaranteed to be any specific one.

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is bad but probably not sustainable in this instance. One of the epidemiologists on Twitter I follow suggested that the real worry will be when avian flu hits hog farms, as that's when it'll have the opportunity to mutate into a human capable variant en masse. That, combined with humanity's newfound aversion to preventative measures, is when we'll all probably get to experience The Stand ARG.

Edit: Remember to mask, everybody.

M O O N, that spells Immoonocompromised. Which you likely are.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
120 points (100.0% liked)

news

23510 readers
663 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS