[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 17 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

it was always wild to me back in the day when so many container images were based on ubuntu… was like PLEASE debian is functionally identical here at like 1/10th the base container size!

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

yeah! animal testing only exists to cause harm! outcomes are irrelevant - science gets off on beating up animals and THATS why animal testing exists… those sadistic pricks

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 16 points 3 days ago

she probably even paid taxes

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 6 days ago

so does fairy bread!

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 54 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

lol look at you thinking in 2024 like the law matters

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 44 points 4 months ago

if you’re contribution is a paper that you don’t even proof read to ensure it makes any sense at all then your contribution isn’t “productive science”; it’s a waste of everyone’s time

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 45 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

if someone wears a shirt specifically designed to draw attention to their larger than average breasts, perhaps people should not be surprised when people… yknow… pay attention to said breasts?

with that being said, the actual content of the comments, pretty gross and degrading… but the fact that the comments are about breasts should not be surprising in the slightest

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 55 points 9 months ago

I’m from Australia and I’ve started calling all groups of people yall because it’s gender neutral… very unaustralian term, and I love so much the irony of iconic southern terms being used to support trans activism

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 41 points 10 months ago

oracles lawyers are pretty bad too

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 45 points 1 year ago

their methods are indeed significantly more sophisticated than that. explaining them accurately, however is beyond my knowledge… and i’m a principal engineer that deals with security quite regularly

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

what this requires from developers: possibly documenting protocols in an open way when they choose to shut down games so that people can re-implement FOSS servers

“playable” is open to interpretation, and does not include trademarks, copyright, etc… nobody is asking for to allow assets to be traded (ie piracy), or open sourcing any code

but if you have purchased a game, and the servers for that game go away, someone else should be able to re-implement a method for allowing those games to continue being played

… also if DRM servers go away, you should disable the DRM somehow: you don’t get to just say that the DRM and therefor the game isn’t available any more

all of this is not at all knee-jerk, and very realistic

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 45 points 2 years ago

i mean, “unless” tends to be the usual term for an “if not” keyword in languages that implement such a thing

view more: next ›

pupbiru

joined 2 years ago