[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 11 points 19 hours ago

I’m the same. I’ve used many and forget about them eventually. I used rubiks cubes constantly for a few years, but that was a more central interest. I fidget with random things for a day. I’ve used fidget spinners and putty and all sorts of stuff, but sooner or later I’m bored. I mean, they do the trick temporarily. Recently I made my own silicone “picky pads.” They’re a fine activity to become absorbed in, possibly regulating, but they are not something to do in the background and don’t compare to cuticles. My current thing while reading is to spin a prayer wheel because Buddhism’s my special interest. Sorry this is a little pessimistic, I am very understimulated right now.

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

Ah, but he resigned therefore your prediction must be wrong.

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

No. Denmark activates article 5.

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago

Bookchin’s on my list. I wonder if that has anything to do with ‘the Ecological Thought.’

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

That’s fair. I prefer to read articles or primary sources at random, but I also don’t know what I’d do without random podcasts and videos and honestly where I’d be without some random and very elementary in person classes I once took. Textbooks are a source of info, whoever reads them. Honestly there’s some odd idiosyncratic reasons I don’t want to read textbooks. My ADHD says if I’m learning about something it’s good to make it quick and textbooks aren’t that. My autism says if I want to claim knowledge on philosophical positions it is best to have read the real source material from front to back whether I understand or not, and textbooks are too secondary for a time commitment.

My point is that I think that an “official” Marxist introduction to the very theory that says how to think and how we know things should avoid dogmatism and revisionism, and that’s a hard thing. We don’t want anyone abandoning Marxism to random pointless idealism and we don’t want anyone disregarding Mao because it doesn’t feel right to what they’ve been indoctrinated in. And of course we don’t want anyone treating Marxism as a fixed truth without a real understanding of the counter arguments.

Any text has its perspective and potential to influence. I am just currently in full skepticism I don’t what to believe including if it’s possible to believe mode, tons of contradictory ideas with different sources floating in my head.

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

needless complicationAh, but Marxists disagree about philosophy. How would we decide (like we’re a unified body lol) what to put in such a text. We are even divided within ourselves on these subjects (dialectics, duh). What is the aim of this introduction? Presumably this is for the reading of non-Marxist texts, but how do we prime people to do such? Do we give them doctrines that they must compare with others to decide their “correctness?” Do we try to teach them how to think? Each question comes with more that are disagreed upon within philosophy, even Marxist. What is the ends we wish to encourage? Marxism is general pragmatic toward the ends of revolution but how should philosophy encourage that? There is a dialectical balance to strike in our actions towards revolution and we must somehow lead people to better their judgments.

Most importantly, who the heck reads textbooks? There are probably already decent Marxist articles on philosophy, with contradictions. I think we should just make sure people read Mao and encourage them to read whatever they feel like it. Under the assumption Freire was right, I guess we philosophy nerds can continue engaging in discussion with other organizers and hope that works?

I know many leftist movements have been harmed by bad ideas but it is hard to know how to promote correct ideas when they change from situation to situation and I’m not omniscient however much I feel like I know about philosophy.

I don’t know why I had to go on this skeptical rant (autism) but I’ll post.

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If you’re really ready to read difficult texts start with Wittgenstein and learn why philosophy is a mistake.

Definitely figure out what you hope to get out of your study, because if it’s nothing to you but a pile of facts it’s not much use. Do you enjoy learning about the origin of ideas or how to act morally? My deep interests are the nature of being and how we know words correspond to things and thus how to think. If you don’t know but like comics, I recommend browsing https://www.existentialcomics.com/ and picking up more material on whoever sounds interesting.

There are some alright ancients but Diogenes is indeed the best.

Edit: as a Marxist I will endlessly promote dialectics as the most valuable philosophy as paradoxical logic is useful for understanding many other things including other philosophies. For chronology, start with Heraclitus. For ease start with Mao. Well, you could also start with the eastern ancients.

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago

Anyone into philosophy/ethics/theology?

sicko-laser Kant was probably autistic btw. I respect all sorts of foundationalism but I don’t necessarily agree with Kant from my little engagement. I have yet to read him of course. Those are quite the authors to start with. If they call to you sure, but I’ve read way more philosophy than most people and they sound relatively daunting. I tend to hop authors constantly, reading whatever I feel like at the moment. There’s some sort of unity and connections but that could be confusing for some people. I recommend starting with secondary or tertiary material.

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago

Even if you are not dreaming? Idk

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago

Not even logically sound, because the brain is still working when you’re asleep, but you do you.

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago

Probably not if they don’t eat the brain :(. Bit idea: convincing reactionary raw meat weirdos that the brain is the best part of the body for food and it will make them more intelligent or something.

33
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by QueerCommie@hexbear.net to c/neurodiverse@hexbear.net

excerpted passage

It is commonly called “noting”, and has its origins in Sutta 111 of the Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha (or Majjhima Nikaya [MN], very worthwhile reading), usually referred to as MN 111, called “One by One as They Occurred”, and in MN 10, Satipatthana Sutta (variously translated as “Four Foundations of Mindfulness”, or “Frames of Reference”, etc.), as well as Sutta 22, Mahasatipatthana Sutta (“Greater Discourse on Mindfulness”) of the Long Discourses of the Buddha (or Digha Nikaya [DN]), usually referred to as DN 22. Noting is used primarily in the Mahasi Sayadaw insight tradition from Burma, though related exercises can be found in various Zen traditions, notably Soto Zen and Korean Chan, such as repeatedly asking, “What is this?”

Noting is the exercise that gained for me the most breaks and insights in my early practice, particularly when done on retreats, and because of that my enthusiasm for it is extreme. I still consider it the core foundation of my early to middle practice, the technique that I fell back on when things turned difficult or when I really wanted to push deep into new insight territory.

The practice is this: make a quiet, mental one-word note of whatever you experience in each moment. Try to stay with the sensations of breathing, which may occur in many places, noting these quickly as “rising” (as many times as the sensations of the breath rising are experienced) and then “falling” in the same way. These are the fundamental insight practice instructions. When the mind wanders, notes might include “thinking”, “feeling”, “pressure”, “tension”, “wandering”, “anticipating”, “seeing”, “hearing”, “cold”, “hot”, “pain”, “pleasure”, etc.

Note these sensations one by one as they occur and then return to the sensations of breathing. When walking, note the feet moving as “lifting” and “placing”, or as “lifting”, “moving”, and “placing” as you perceive each of the many sensations of all those processes, noticing other sensations as they arise and returning simply to the sensations of the feet walking.

The details of this practice can be found in such books as Practical Insight Meditation, by Mahasi Sayadaw, which I highly recommend, available free online in various places and in book form. This is my all-time favorite dharma book. It is short and to the point. Its instructions work and the promised effects are reproducible. The first forty-two pages are total gold. There is no need for me to repeat much of the useful information found there, as it is pithy and now readily available online.

From https://www.mctb.org/mctb2/table-of-contents/part-i-the-fundamentals/7-the-seven-factors-of-awakening/

I just did this for a whole bike ride, noting everything that caught my attention. It’s far from “focused” but I remained aware the entire during, while losing track of time and thus impatience. Usually I get lost in thought when I try to be mindful, but I was able to simply label a thought or perception and move on. There are a lot of sensations if you pay attention so it will be challenging but that’s what keeps the mind engaged. You don’t need to be aware of everything at once, just wherever your attention is at a given moment. As well as other benefits, I feel like being aware of how everything is constantly changing helps one perceive life as more novel and thus less boring and miserable.

I’m sure it’s great if you’re not ADHD as well, as that’s the case with the author.

16
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by QueerCommie@hexbear.net to c/neurodiverse@hexbear.net

I keep getting TikTok ads and whenever I see the shop logo in the corner or “sponsored” I scroll away. They claim to help AuDHD but I have no idea what to trust.

I’m curious about mushrooms, lions mane or whatever, and microdosing hallucinogens.

21
How to rest? (hexbear.net)

As an AuDHD perfectionist I’ve never valued rest that much. I feel like I should be doing something interesting and being sedentary is bad for you. Recently I have realized the importance of resting as I have been exhausted by external demands and stimuli. I am at the point where even mostly lying around in my room all day, small demands and noises are too much. All I am able to really do is hyperfocus on my phone or maybe half attentively read. I know people can spend days in bed recovering from life, but I don’t have that time. I value this time not doing anything, but I’m afraid if I don’t get active or something I will have trouble falling asleep later. I know staying in your bed while awake disassociates it from getting ready to sleep so I have been lying elsewhere. Any tips? I have been eating. Are there comfy headphones that actually kill all the sound? Bc my ears do not want to process anything anymore.

35
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by QueerCommie@hexbear.net to c/neurodiverse@hexbear.net

I’ve seen it referenced on TikTok but I’m curious about the evidence. It seems pretty plausible. The same gene is involved apparently. There’s very high “comorbidity.” Even in non “AuDHDers” many of the symptoms of one (that an individual “doesn’t have”) are present. Autists can be very different from eachother and it seems like they may sometimes have more in common with some ADHDers than eachother. Dividing things into specific labels like this is kinda lib and undialectical anyway. People already realizing Aspergers and other things were just autism. “Pathological Defiant Disorder” (allegedly) seems to basically just be a common presentation of AuDHD. There’s also the monotropism theory that both tend to be high in.

This is just my uneducated opinion on something I’ve been fixated on and pondering for a little while. I’m curious if anyone has any serious evidence or more interesting thoughts. There’s probably also connections to other neurodivergences.

43
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by QueerCommie@hexbear.net to c/neurodiverse@hexbear.net

I have trouble telling what the pain in my stomach is telling me, so I pretty much only just realized how bad my body hates certain sensory and social stuff. It’s as though my insides were on fire and the only way to slightly affect it is to cry (and obvi get away from the noise). I thought it was just anxiety or under stimulation before, but no, those are separate things. I have spent hours today doing various self care type stuff (meditation, being in nature, exercising, mindfully eating, yoga nitra, massage, taking a bath, fun things on the internet, positive stimulus of other sorts, zoning out), and the feeling’s still there. I don’t even mask. How do you deal with having to be in a sensory hell for hours of the day? How do you calm down? Please don’t say drugs.

Context: ADHD often makes people struggle with interoception and being able to relax.

68
My weakness (hexbear.net)
submitted 6 months ago by QueerCommie@hexbear.net to c/vegan@hexbear.net
30
Hear me out (hexbear.net)

“National Socialist” > Nazi

“Patriotic Socialist” > Pazi

“Democratic Socialist” > Democrazi (moderate wing of fascism after all)

“Libertarian Socialist” > Liberzi

Best of all: “Utopian Socialist” > Uzi

26

I happened to open Instagram and immediately saw there was some drama going on. It appears to be agreed that PlantsFanon had a bad take about Lenin and stood by it when challenged by Sungmanitou. The decolonized Buffalo people allege they went around democratic centralism, brought up nuclear and threatened to wreck. Sungmanitou says they stood by the bad take, repeatedly misgendered them and acted like feds. Who’s in the right here? What would be a good outcome? @Nakoichi@hexbear.net

27
28
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by QueerCommie@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

It was such a good book idk how I haven't made this post yet. Just the introduction will have you hooked.

link to free download here or here

In summary, Ted Reese shows how Marxism Leninism is the way forward if we are to save the planet. It is largely a reaction to Fully Automated Luxury Communism and the general trend of people trying to reinvent socialism with utopian ideas in order to stop climate change. I actually read that right before, so it might be part of why I like this book. He explains how the TRPF is leading to the inevitable fall of capitalism in the near future. Anyone who denies that capitalism is reaching its final breaking point is in error. Labor theory of value continues to be vindicated. It's counter-tendencies cannot help it. Humanity looks pretty screwed with climate change, but socialism can enable innovation, stop extraction, and plan our way to a healthy world. Socialism will also employ easy technology and methods that capitalism refuses because it will undermine it's function. The path towards a new socialism is through studying the successes and failures of AES, not through trying to "discover" new forms, or repeating old forms. Principled Leninist tactics are the way.

This book gave me a lot of hope and I've recommended it to multiple libs (🤞). I highly recommend it.

Limitations:

It was published almost five years ago, so it's not all up to date on the geopolitics and so on. As we all know, the past few years we've had many weeks where decades happened. Reese takes a neutral position on China's socialistness, despite presenting evidence to the positive. He doesn't talk about decolonization, which makes sense for a Br*t, but that means it's not all encompassing. There is a lot of great info in there. It might not be easiest for complete newbies, but you don't have to read too much other theory first.

Here's some memes:

Long live ecosocialism!

view more: next ›

QueerCommie

joined 2 years ago