This did not have to be ~~live action~~
Don't do my boy Fry dirty like this.
I remember a lot more of those stick-on glow in the dark plastic stars, if nothing else.
Remember folks, you can't spell Mark Hamill without Arkham.
Not about to be swindled, the monk the pulls a gun from within his robe. "What's that?!" the startled vendor asks. "Ah," replies the monk, "this is my inner piece."
Oh no! People are being mean to the human equivalent of an unwiped asshole covered in weeping pus sores?
My only issue is that the expression on the statue looks fairly calm. The lady in the photo is fuckin PISSED.
So, when you remove what I assume is an announcement bot and lizard people from the equation, the answer is George Takei? Yeah, that sounds about right.
Well, I can't say I can name even one of her songs, but if she triggers magats and has Luke Skywalker on her side, then I guess it's time to get Swiftie in here or whatever.
So the timeline of the new Trek movies starts with the villain Nero going back in time. When he gets there, he destroys a ship called the USS Kelvin. That ship was not destroyed in the original Star Trek timeline, so the new timeline is called that because the Kelvin's destruction was the first major point of divergence that lead to the other changes in that timeline
I would also argue that "whores and scoundrels" is more inclusive. You can be either one regardless of your parts or gender identity.
They make loosely braided weighted blankets. They won't be as cool as this, but they allow for plenty of weight while still maintaining good airflow. And a far lower risk of scrotum/labia/nipple tragedy.