Cool as they are, we have very little evidence these were used historically or were actual combat weapons.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hook_sword

Oh this is the gayest green text I've seen in long time /s

I think it's better to check with a vet. He solved my dogs problem with dangling balls.

Oh man, I still recall blasting my way with Boone through Caesar's legions on my way to the legions fort.

It is the canvas on which the culinary artistry cannot exist without

Pls let me put Trump sign on lawn

Stick around a bit. Unfunny comics is a hot new trend on this sub. Quality is going downhill.

The inspiration for Squidward?

Also explains my urge to eat this man's wife's ass.

NFTs are essentially a decentralized >token. This means that they can be >used to represent anything you might >want to represent with a token, e.g. >ownership of a physical object such as a car or a house; ownership of a digital >asset, such as a website or game

No.

NFTs are not proof of ownership. At best they are the equivalent to receipts, at worse they are mere url links. They are certainly not title deeds, not proof of copyright ownership or anything of that sort. They are just a ledger that person D paid something to person C who paid something to person B who paid something to person A.

Lets use those NFT monkeys as an example. There is literally no proof anywhere on that NFT chain that person A is the rightful copyright owner or has the rights to sell said image. Furthermore, there is no proof that person A gave the rights to person B to resell said image. Or that anyone down the chain sold the complete rights instead of just selling the link to access monkey.jpg

Does profusely apologizing for puking on their dress count as conversation?

If yes then I'll have you know I'm quite the socializer.