[-] Shard@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Where did you study?

Oh some university on the west of england

1
Fits perfectly here (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 1 week ago by Shard@lemmy.world to c/dadjokes@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/25341720

Well, not ALL puzzles... [Dark Side of the Horse]

Via Mastodon.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 138 points 2 weeks ago

Alright where are all the YouTube premium apologetics that keep appearing everytime someone discusses any sort of Ad-blocker?! What do you guys have to say now?!

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 99 points 3 weeks ago

RIP democracy :(

-3
I says does yes! (lemmy.world)
[-] Shard@lemmy.world 103 points 2 months ago

Son goes crazy in a good way or bad way?

Like I can imagine a 4 year old going wild with excitement cause the parents are home. Or a 14 year old cringing hard

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 79 points 2 months ago

Oh god. The mother has 5 fingers.

5 fingers, not including thumbs...

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 80 points 5 months ago

Physical proof? No. But if that's the criterion for proof that someone existed, then that mean 90% of historical figures can't be proven to have existed. We don't have the remains of Alexander the Great or any artefacts we can be sure are his. We have no remnants of Plato, none of his original writings remain.

Did a person name Jesus live sometime during the first century AD? Scholars are fairly certain of that. We do have textual evidence other than the bible that points to his existence.

It is highly unlikely that he was anything like the person written about in the bible. He was likely one of many radical apocalyptic prophets of the time.

We don't have too many details about his life but because of something called the criterion of embarrassment we have good reason to believe he was baptized by a man named John the Baptist and was later crucified. (i.e. most burgeoning religions seeking legitimacy don't typically invent stories that are embarrassing to their deity)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 84 points 5 months ago

Someone's gonna get jailed for revealing state secrets and embarrassing the party.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 136 points 7 months ago

Everyday we are reminded of the damage that state-sponsored misinformation can do.

The stupidest part about brexit was that it was a non-binding referendum. They could have just ignored it. But I guess sometimes you need your house to burn down before you realize why we need a publicly funded fire department.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 88 points 8 months ago

I'm conflicted with this one.

If we return it to a country of origin that has no protections for priceless artefacts, we lose an irreplaceable part of our heritage as humans if the piece is lost/sold/stolen or worse destroyed. Granted it may be that country's right to decide what it does with its history, but its unfair to the rest of us when we lose our shared history because of incompetence.

Like the Buddha statues that were destroyed by the Taliban,

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhas_of_Bamiyan

As impractical as it would have been, I would much have preferred they were excavated and shipped to a safe museum or city somewhere, than being destroyed by ideological bigots. We lost an important piece of history, architecture and craftsmanship that day.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 182 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't be so quick to discount her injuries. Ask anyone with a nagging back injury, some days you feel like an absolute champ and can throw a damn tree, but other days you're bed ridden from pinched up nerves. Thats just the nature of the injury.

I had a friend who got into a car accident, driver drove off a bridge. She's got a permanently fked up back. But you'd never know it from looking at her. Some days she's out and about playing football and cycling, other days she'll take 2 hours to get out of bed because the slightest movement will leave her in tears from her fked up vertebrae.

264
Maiden in the Tower (lemmy.world)

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/7784033

The Girl in the Window, Kabukicho 歌舞伎町

tokyostreetphoto

666

https://www.blastwave-comic.com/index.php?p=comic&nro=1

Not my OC. Just wanted to bring attention to a little underated comic strip. Great artwork. Different tone and topic to what's commonly posted here. Enjoy.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

The problem there is that the teeth are supported by the jaw bones.

We've had dental implants for the past 2 decades that are pretty indestructible as you describe. The only problem is the jaw bones you drill into aren't that robust. Especially when you start putting multiple holes in it to hold the teeth. So the jaw bone part of the implant tends to fail after about a decade or two, even when the tooth part of it is still plenty robust.

Which frankly is the same problem faced by all proposed cybernetic implants/augmentations. The cybernetic part can be as indestructible as you want, but the organics its attached to are comparatively fragile.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Have you seen the one where the company says we shouldn't use the terms male/female in a technical setting because it implies only 2 genders and apparently genders exist on some sort of spectrum?

So I emailed HR to ask for alternative suggestions and if I had permission to refer to ports and connectors as penis and vagina connectors. I think this will be an important discussion because the have the director of HR, legal and my manager scheduled for a meeting next week.

43
submitted 1 year ago by Shard@lemmy.world to c/funny@lemmy.world
2439
submitted 1 year ago by Shard@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

Shard

joined 1 year ago