Is there a historical precedent for punishing the defender for daring to successfully resist invasion by a third country?
"Grab'em by the resources. When you're a superpower, they let you do it."
It's worse than that, they said it wasn't a nazi salute. :/
Who could have predicted this???
That's one of the things I love in lemmy. Moderation transparency.
The other day I visited youtube without any add-ons and concluded I'd rather do anything else than use youtube under those conditions.
Antitrust comes in waves in the US. First, it's a free for all to let the tech develop freely...then you see the horrors and a time of antitrust kicks in. This would be the 4th wave since the Sherman Act. Let's hope it's a good one.
Is this guy delusional? After the way his party treated him in the convention, he still doubles down that the problem is the democrats?
I'd rather have him tried and imprisoned at the Hague. He destroys institutions. Institutions must destroy him in the end, not guns.
PS: and before the tankies rush in with their whataboutisms: Sinwar, Netanyahu and Dubbya should be made an example of too.
My only regret was not deleting all my comments before deleting my reddit account :P
Hm, playing devil's advocate, I think it is because the minus has not been defined as a string operation (e.g. it could pop the last char), so it defaults to the mathematical operation and converts both inputs into ints.
The first is assumed to be a concat because one of the parcels is a string...
It's just doing a lot of stuff for you that it shouldn't be in first place 🤭