261
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 79 points 2 months ago

For those not appearing to get it, Trump allowed his sycophants to berate Zelenskyy for not wearing a suit in his White House meeting. Folks are treating Trump's attire faux pas accordingly.

[-] archonet@lemy.lol 49 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

More than that, Trump isn't in the middle of actively fighting a fucking war, and a funeral has one single, solitary wardrobe expectation: wear black.*

Even if not for that utter dumpster fire of a press conference, I also remember the fuss made about Obama's tan suit that he just happened to wear during a televised event (which was not a funeral). On every level, this clown deserves mockery.

*not universal to all kinds of funeral ceremonies, I know. this, however, was one of those funerals.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago

a funeral has one single, solitary wardrobe expectation: wear black.*

You're not wrong. I put special instructions (Canadian Tuxedo) in my will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honestly, now that we're literally sending people to concentration camps, I have zero fucks to give about this superficial bullshit. No one gives a shit about what Hitler wore at the '36 Olympics, and no one's gonna care what this asshole wore to a funeral.

[-] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 months ago

It's purely to be on the attack. Republicans showed for the last fifteen years if you're performatively aggressive against the opposition eventually you get what you want.

You don't have to hate Trump or his suit color. Just love democracy and socialism and the working class. If this gets some apolitical conservative people to not vote for the Republicans then awesome.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The thing was that they resorted to the tan suit and terrorist first bump bullshit because Obama gave them so little to work with. For Trump you didn't need to waste everyone's time when his administration is ignoring court orders, arresting judges, declaring warrants and due process unnecessary, and tanking the economy.

The tan suit stuff may have helped energize the base by preaching to the choir, but everyone else found it ridiculous and made them skeptical of conservative media. When you are inundated nearly daily with real terrible stuff, no need to undermine credibility by latching into this sort of fluff.

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I agree, and once would have dismissed the sociopolitical pragmatism described by the commenter above as “lowering our discourse to their level” or something of the sort.

I eventually realized that this instinctive criticism was valid only if they were still growing as people, and capable of more than what they are now. The assumption is that doing so might convince them to “elevate their discourse,” if only to save face.

But what I’ve come to realize is that this was far too much to expect. By all the evidence we have to date, these folks never advanced far beyond the emotional maturity of the average middle schooler. At this level of maturity, superficial and public humiliation is quite literally the most serious attack, since it bloodies sharky waters.

Yes it’s pathetic, and yes “stooping to their level” feels gross, but Republican voters are only enthused by policies which benefit them directly or hurt others. Perceived power matters a lot, and tends to be attached directly to explicit expressions of it, so a public humiliation of trump for an otherwise petty and irrelevant issue (especially by someone he can’t touch without losing a chunk of his base) succeeds in making him look weak, and making Trump look weak is directly correlated with his voters’ loss of motivation (see RWA personality type/disorder; it’s fascinating). Enough of that framing will cause his most die-hard voters to lose faith in him and seek out somebody stronger. That is, to de-motivate a current right-wing conservative voter, we must accept that petty “mean girl” tactics are the only language they understand, due to their arrested emotional development.

TLDR: crass pragmatism is warranted. Small-mindedness is their first language, often the only one they understand, so we must learn to roll our sleeves up and speak it back to them, if only to prevent them from spreading it to future generations.

Edit: corrected swype errors.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 months ago

Probably Hugo Boss if I had to guess.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

This was not an accident. First, it gets him to stand out from the crowd, draw all the attention to himself, and make it all about him which is what he lives and breathes for. Second, it gets the media to focus on something other than him eliminating due process, having judges arrested, using the DOJ to attack perceived enemies, deporting US citizens, and completely ignoring court rulings while those who have the power to stop it sit back and either do nothing or actively support it.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago

gets the media to focus on something other

I didn't see the clown makeup until you mentioned it; but that's what it is, isn't it? The circus continues.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago
[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

Yeah, it's the suit that's embarrassing, not the "239 lbs" of rancid garbage sloshing around inside.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

No fucking way he's less than 250lbs

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

That's why they put it in quotes. During his first term his personal doctor listed Trump's weight at 239, which everyone with at least one functioning eyeball knows is complete horseshit. But naturally he lies about that like he lies about everything else

[-] Bieren@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Thank god it wasn’t tan.

[-] fake_meows@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

The tan suit had mustard stains on it, otherwise...

[-] Jamablaya@lemmy.today 20 points 2 months ago

This whole thing is stupid.

[-] nyctre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Apparently the dress code is dark suit + black tie. So this is fine. Trump's tie was blue

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Alaknar@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

This guy is not the president of the United States.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] index@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

This is the sort of news that does nothing but bring attention away from real problems. Blame these idiots for being a bunch of liars and criminals (including the pope) not for wearing the wrong suit color.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Just one in my lifetime I wanna see the rapists, the convicted felons, the wannabe gangsters elected to office, the people linked to Jeffrey Epstein, the presidents who put personal interest before country, the tactless lying connen grifters and the orange buffoons leave this plane before the good men with some semblance of balance, tolerance, moderation and compassion.

Just once in my lifetime.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 months ago

At least kissinger finally kicked it

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

How did he even get an invite?

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Probably paid for it, like his Nobel nomination.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago

Remember when Obama rocked that tan suit yall?

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Because of Trump the world thinks us a fool.

[-] Geobloke@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Don't try to shame 47, he has no shame. I can't even watch the UK office because of second hand cringe, but he would probably take notes

[-] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

It's not about shaming Trump. Like you say, he has no shame. It's about exhausting his base. It takes a second to make fun of him for it.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Only poor people wear black suits (he thinks to himself).

[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Well he's finally being held to the same standards as Obama

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Wdym? Obama pulled it off. Trump just looks tired. And angry. But more tired.

[-] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Honestly, I don't give a fuck. He's doing genuinely despicable things that are much more deserving of the media's limited time.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Funerals are for the family. Not the dead person. You won’t care because you’re dead, I’m sure his close friends and relatives cared quite a bit.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

..... and they had a never ending media fiasco for a president wearing a tan suit ... and it didn't have anything to do with a funeral or anything, a black president just decided one day to wear a tan suit!

Meanwhile an orange president is given directions and suggestion as to what to wear to an international funeral for a prominent figure and he ignores all protocols because he is just that dense.

He's laughing at all of us because he's thumbing his nose at the world to let everyone know he can do whatever he pleases without any regard for decency or respect ... for himself, his country, the living or even for the dead.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
261 points (95.2% liked)

politics

24823 readers
1037 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS