61

No need to name names or sources.

Mine has to be some dude that insisted that advertising is a "30,000 year old technology"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 55 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That using 100% free and open source software is more important than actually getting your work done.

In a thread about Affinity Photo where someone insisted that we should all use gimp and just not edit photos if gimp doesn't have the features we need rather than asking Serif to port their software to Linux.

Also in several threads about migrating from Windows to Linux where every missing or complicated feature was brushed away with "just get used to not being able to do it, even if it's critical to your workflow".

[-] socphoenix@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago

That is 10,000% people who don’t do creative work especially professionally. I am fine with gimp and darktable versus anything Adobe/paid but I also barely use them lol. I would be back off Linux in a heartbeat if I honestly couldn’t use something I needed even though I prefer it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Samsonreturns@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Someone was trying to say the Van Halen's song "Jump" was about suicide. Despite being presented with an interview with David Lee Roth (who wrote the song) explaining what the song was about. Still think about that. Idk why. Maybe because it was like one of those conversations you have with an edgy emo kid in highschool and realize they are full of shit. Some weird nostalgia I guess

People fixate on certain lyrics and kinda ignore the rest of the song.

I knew someone who swore "Hallelujah" by Leonard Cohen was a dirty song because two lines could be interpreted as innuendo.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

"Hallelujah" has an overt reference to the story of David & Bathsheba in the Bible, which is a story about a king watching a woman bathe and then sending her husband into an unwinnable battle so he could steal her from him.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It is a song influenced by seeing a report about a suicidal jumper, but repurposing the idea into a positive one. Basically, it is saying that instead of a suicide jump someone should take a leap of faith and improve things.

[-] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

One that I read on Mastodon:

Every bad thing about commercial software is the programmers' fault. Even if it was something that management decided and the programmer fought against it and lost. They claimed you should rather risk losing your job than accepting an inconvenience for your user. Weird take but okay. Then they started comparing software engineers to soldiers "just following orders" during the holocaust. That's where I blocked them. Cherry on top: they have "if you want to hire me as a software engineer, message me" in their bio. I wonder why nobody wants to hire them...

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

Even Nathan Poe would be amazed at the speed that that devolved into nazi comparisons

[-] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think you mean Mike Godwin. Poe's Law is about satire being hard to distinguish actual extremist views.

Edit: I really wanted to add a joke about Ward Cunningham but couldn't find a good way to phrase it.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Ward Cunningham, creator of Calvin & Hobbes?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aislopmukbang@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago
[-] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

But some of the posts are hilarious lmao

I use Mint btw

[-] plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 week ago

wow the ratio on those posts

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

And it's not even satire, the dude generally has a hate boner for Linux.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago

I remember him somehow managing to get banned by his autoban-bot on that community

[-] Samsy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Wow, are we the baddies? This guy must have a really bad time in the Linux communities.

[-] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Kinda unironically: yes.

Linux is great for some use cases and at least decent for most others but what I've experienced in some Linux communities made me understand why people don't feel welcome. In a thread literally titled "Help me like desktop Linux" that listed a few things I was struggling with, I got hit with a bunch of "you're an idiot for not using the exact same distro that I like", "works on my machine" and "you want the wrong things". Even as someone who already had over a decade of Linux server experience, that almost made me turn around and walk away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RandomStickman@fedia.io 27 points 1 week ago

One of the first argument I've got myself into was returning the shopping cart to the designated spot. This person was replying to like 5 people at once justifying why they don't always return the cart, because the weather is hot and the corral is far, etc. while we disapproved.

Got some reddit argument PTSD from that lol

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago

I suspect that person would also justify littering in order to "ensure street cleaners don't lose their jobs"

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Shopping cart theory strikes again

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Here’s a fresh one: someone called me a shitty parent because I think Americans are generally very intolerant of kids in public spaces. They flew off the handle because I said what some people call “annoying” I call “being a kid.” There are a lot of people on Lemmy who get very angry about the idea that kids might irritate them or otherwise make themselves known, and they immediately start ranting about how those parents are dog shit and the kids need to essentially be muzzled.

I have a pretty big ax to grind with all the eugenics/breeder bullshit going on in my country right now. It’s very scary and I get why people are weary of having kids. But anti-natalism is not a good look and this tendency for people to feel borderline virtuous for calling parents shitty for “not controlling their kids“ is really something to behold.

I’m not even here to have that debate. What’s so shocking to me is after just a couple of sentences the default stance is “you must be a shitty parent.” It’s pretty awful thing to say but I see it thrown around so casually all the time like how the right just calls people pedophiles for no fucking reason (obviously very different tiers of accusations but you get the point).

[-] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Not just kids, a lot of adults are annoying as hell too.
But Kids should be free to learn so for me it feels like they are allowed/have the right to be annoying

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

Listen, I just hate kids man. It’s probably my most consistent thing since I was a kid. Fuck kids. We should just be growing adults out of a vat, it’s 2025 for fucks sake.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

because I think ~~Americans are generally very intolerant of kids in public spaces.~~ kids running around and screaming in a restaurant is fine, actually

Don't go to other threads and lie about your conversations, dude, they're public!

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Broadfern@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I agree, but also I think there’s a line between “kiddo getting excited or having a hard time in a public space” vs. “this kid is being neglected by their parents in favor of phones, and/or not taught general manners and human-to-human respect” because their parents are also inconsiderate of other people.

A child having a meltdown in a grocery store, or bouncing around a park or making excited commentary at a movie theater I can easily forgive. Ignoring and letting a child run off unattended in a restaurant where a server can trip and get hurt is a problem. A kid getting antsy happens, but you also need to let them know why they should be mindful in certain environments.

That said, there needs to be more openly kid-friendly spaces in the US, since they need free space to let off energy and develop their minds freely.

[-] MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh yeah you're that dude who was commenting on my meme about kids being annoying in a restaurant. I didn't feel the need to comment there because I had thought "person doesn't realize that few people have problems with well behaved kids or understand that people know that kids OCCASIONALLY act out.". But it looks like you're doubling down.

First, did you see anyone complaining about kids on playgrounds? Play places at fast food restaurants? Public parks? No? That's because those are places for kids to be running around. Restaurants where adults are trying to relax is not for kids to be running around. Full stop. There is no "but". YOU need to teach your child that their actions affect those around them.

Secondly, YOU choose to have children and where you take them. If you take them to a place where you know they have the potential to inconvenience the people around them and they do, then you are inflicting them on others and that makes you a bad parent.

And lastly, I can't even remember the amount of children who stayed at their table, where maybe a little louder than would be necessary but ultimately settled down, or were well behaved and well mannered. But I do remember that the parents of those children were usually well put together and maintained people who seemed to have control over their life. An unruly child who was running around the restaurant is usually a symptom and not the problem.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I didn't see the meme, but--

YOU choose to have children and where you take them. If you take them to a place where you know they have the potential to inconvenience the people around them and they do, then you are inflicting them on others and that makes you a bad parent.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I kinda feel like that ignores the reality of how kids learn. They can't be taught how to act at restaurants if they're left at home for their entire childhood. We've got fairly well-behaved children, but it's because they were a little bit crazy when they were younger and we disciplined them through the process. Particularly for neuro-spicy kids, they're never going to be able to learn how to calm down unless you take them to those places, teach them how to act, and discipline them when they transgress those boundaries.

Yeah, it's an inconvenience to others, but them being a minor inconvenience now so that they won't be a major inconvenience when they're adults is kind of the tradeoff you make in order to live in a reasonably well-adjusted society.

Now, if you're talking about, like, a Michelin-starred restaurant with pristine tablecloths and no dollar signs on the menu, that's one thing. People save up for months to have a single pleasant, quiet night at places like that, and parents need to find better ways/locations to train their kids. But if you mean Applebees or whatever, I kind of think the minor inconvenience now is worth the better-behaved adult the kids will turn into.

[-] kobra@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

I think the annoying kids in restaurants stereotype we’re talking about are usually when the parents of the kids are ignoring the behavior rather than trying to teach their kids anything.

Your ideal scenario here is fine but 99% of the time when I’m super irritated at kids its because the parents are ignoring and/or downplaying the affect their kids have on other people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I remember that one. It was a weird thread. We had people saying they let their kids poop on the floor, and others that only let their kids out of their cages for special occasions.

Of course, those were exaggerations of the extremes, but it got very heated.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Once knew someone who was convinced that Rage Against the Machine was a white supremacist band.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Whatever the hell this conversation was:

Transcript:

Recessa, ↑4 ↓1: That’s completely idiotic, production exist because there’s demand for it.

commie, ↑1 ↓4: I think you understand that milk is produced as part of the mammalian reproductive cycle. can you describe the causal steps between demanding milk and it’s production?

friendlymessage, ↑3 ↓2: Do you think dairy cattle just randomly spawns on the planetary surface?

commie, ↑1 ↓3: do you think there’s a direct causal link between drinking milk and more being produced?

friendlymessage, ↑3: Are you fucking with me?

commie, ↑2 ↓3: no. I’m trying to illustrate that markets are not governed by natural law; they are populated by irrational actors.

friendlymessage, ↑2 ↓1: Yeah, but they’re not as irrational as you are and producing milk costs money. If there’s no market, they will stop because they are not fuckin lunatics and they don’t have infinite resources

commie, ↑2 ↓2: milk was farmed before markets existed. there is no reason to believe that will ever stop.

friendlymessage, ↑3 ↓1: That… must be the dumbest discussion I’ve had in a while. Please read through your comments tomorrow when you’re sober

commie, ↑1 ↓1: I’ve been sober all day.

friendlymessage, ↑1: Okay, whatever you say

commie, ↑1 ↓2: everything I’ve said is true. you’re objecting to reality, and being pretty shitty about it to me.

friendlymessage, ↑2: No, you’re just making a no sensical argument at all. Milk was farmed from dairy cattle because it was consumed by humans. It’s simple supply and demand. There is no rational argument at all that if mankind stopped consuming milk, it would still be farmed. Why would any farmer go through the effort to upkeep cows and keep them impregnanted to make them produce milk if they cannot trade it or won’t consume it? Yes, humans have free will but they won’t produce stuff with very high effort just for fun. Except maybe very sick minds that just enjoy animal cruelty. And you won’t elaborate what your actual point is anyway.

Also, not that it matters, but you’re arguing that dairy farming existed before the market is simply wrong. There has been trade between human civilizations long before we started domesticating animals.

[-] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Having read through the other comments I think this is the winner. This person needs to read a book. What a wild hill to die on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mac@mander.xyz 16 points 1 week ago

Any time any user comments the word "based" to the most normal and reasonable shit ever.
Based has lost all meaning.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Most people don't even know what its supposed to mean

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Aristotle was a professor wrestler who started a math cult that hated beans. He is best known for having developed the intercept theorem and diverting the Halys river.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

It's all true, but I can't prove it

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Norin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

So just a mix and match of partial truths about multiple Ancient Greek philosophers?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lath@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

That you should always keep your graphics card updated to the latest drivers, especially Nvidia

That's not that ridiculous. If you're frequently playing new games at launch (probably a bad idea for different reasons), then latest drivers often contain optimizations and fixes for specific games.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

lol, I remember when I started playing No Man's Sky, I made a post on reddit pointing out that more recent nvidia drivers fucked up the game's framerate big time, like, if I was standing still and moved the mouse around, the framerate would tank. With a previous driver (416 or older), the whole game was butter smooth. I kept playing with that driver until the game had an update that forced you to have newer drivers. Performance was still shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I do out of habit and 99% of the time it has zero downsides and occasional positives. It only borked a game and required rolling back one time that I can remember.

I have a friend who is far more careful about doing their updates because they have frequent problems. Not sure why we have such different experiences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Installing my driver" is a cultural relic from old Windows days where it wasn't automatic; one needed a CD/Floppy or whatever to get your printer or ATI card working. It was good practice. Hence tons of "driver cleaner/updater" kind of shovelware exists to capitalize on that mindset.

...These days, Windows update (or the Arch/CachyOS package repos in my case) auto-update all my hardware with zero fuss. IDK why so many stray from that, unless they encounter a bug that was specifically fixed in an update.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Whatever driver Windows hands you for your nVidia/AMD card is likely to be hilariously out of date. If the driver it gives you is the one with the bug that's bugging you, you won't have a choice.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
61 points (91.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31637 readers
1123 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS